You're almost there! Please answer a few more questions for access to the Applications content. Complete registration
Interested in joining? Complete your registration by providing Areas of Interest here. Register
Get Started: AI Resources for Oracle Cloud HCM – Go Here

Progress with Redwood: Redwood Resources for Oracle Cloud HCM -  Go Here

Why doesn't the 'Not Managed by HR' person type have a payroll relationship

edited Feb 21, 2024 6:14PM in Payroll and Global Payroll Interface (GPI) 3 comments

Summary:

Hi All,


We are currently in the process of converting 'Contingent Workers' to the 'Not Managed By HR' (Non-worker) worker type. 

However, we have identified an issue wherein records created as 'Not Managed By HR' doesn't have a payroll relationship attached.


It's worth noting that other Non-worker types, such as 'Non-worker,' 'Non-worker paid,' and 'Non-worker unpaid,' have a payroll relationship when created.


Even the 'Non-worker unpaid' type has a payroll relationship, whereas the 'Not Managed By HR' type does not.


Note: We want the existing HCM extract (User Entity: PER_EXT_PAY_EMPLOYEES_UE) to fetch this data.

Howdy, Stranger!

Log In

To view full details, sign in.

Register

Don't have an account? Click here to get started!