Get Started with Redwood for Oracle Cloud HCM Begin Now
To ensure that questions get required attention from community members and are NOT left unanswered, it’s important for the author to indicate (by selecting “Yes” or “No” when prompted) whether the question was answered. (newly added) Please note that it is also important to respond to EACH comment your question receives. Your Yes or No response ensures an accurate status for your question.
For more information, please refer to this announcement explaining best practices for getting answers to questions.
For more information, please refer to this announcement explaining best practices for getting answers to questions.
Why doesn't the 'Not Managed by HR' person type have a payroll relationship
Summary:
Hi All,
We are currently in the process of converting 'Contingent Workers' to the 'Not Managed By HR' (Non-worker) worker type.
However, we have identified an issue wherein records created as 'Not Managed By HR' doesn't have a payroll relationship attached.
It's worth noting that other Non-worker types, such as 'Non-worker,' 'Non-worker paid,' and 'Non-worker unpaid,' have a payroll relationship when created.
Even the 'Non-worker unpaid' type has a payroll relationship, whereas the 'Not Managed By HR' type does not.
Note: We want the existing HCM extract (User Entity: PER_EXT_PAY_EMPLOYEES_UE) to fetch this data.
Tagged:
0