You're almost there! Please answer a few more questions for access to the Applications content. Complete registration
Interested in joining? Complete your registration by providing Areas of Interest here. Register
Get Started with Redwood for Oracle Cloud HCM   Begin Now

Why doesn't the 'Not Managed by HR' person type have a payroll relationship

Accepted answer
27
Views
2
Comments
edited Feb 21, 2024 6:14PM in Payroll and Global Payroll Interface (GPI) 2 comments

Summary:

Hi All,


We are currently in the process of converting 'Contingent Workers' to the 'Not Managed By HR' (Non-worker) worker type. 

However, we have identified an issue wherein records created as 'Not Managed By HR' doesn't have a payroll relationship attached.


It's worth noting that other Non-worker types, such as 'Non-worker,' 'Non-worker paid,' and 'Non-worker unpaid,' have a payroll relationship when created.


Even the 'Non-worker unpaid' type has a payroll relationship, whereas the 'Not Managed By HR' type does not.


Note: We want the existing HCM extract (User Entity: PER_EXT_PAY_EMPLOYEES_UE) to fetch this data.

Howdy, Stranger!

Log In

To view full details, sign in.

Register

Don't have an account? Click here to get started!