Get Started with Redwood for Oracle Cloud HCM Begin Now
To ensure that questions get required attention from community members and are NOT left unanswered, it’s important for the author to indicate (by selecting “Yes” or “No” when prompted) whether the question was answered. (newly added) Please note that it is also important to respond to EACH comment your question receives. Your Yes or No response ensures an accurate status for your question.
For more information, please refer to this announcement explaining best practices for getting answers to questions.
For more information, please refer to this announcement explaining best practices for getting answers to questions.
Is it worth using Competencies or Should we make the Plunge into Skills?
Summary:
I've noticed that the new AI data sources are all based on skills - well most of them anyway. And most of the functionalities of grow - including finding Career Ambassadors or related learning etc. is all based on Skills.
So as we're implementing this in-house, we wonder if we should use skills almost exclusively.
The trouble is that Skills are not available in the Performance Document yet to evaluate - that's like 25D or something on the roadmap I'm guessing. Oracle seems to want us to take a more dynamic and ongoing approach to skills management where everything is very fluid and updated whenever. That's great for like very dynamic organizations, but maybe not traditional organizations.
0