Get Started with Redwood for Oracle Cloud HCM Begin Now
To ensure that questions get required attention from community members and are NOT left unanswered, it’s important for the author to indicate (by selecting “Yes” or “No” when prompted) whether the question was answered. (newly added) Please note that it is also important to respond to EACH comment your question receives. Your Yes or No response ensures an accurate status for your question.
For more information, please refer to this announcement explaining best practices for getting answers to questions.
For more information, please refer to this announcement explaining best practices for getting answers to questions.
HR_DOCUMENTS_OF_RECORD_AUDIT Missing DFF Value for Assignment Number (Purged I-9 Report Issue)
We are encountering a critical issue with generating a purged I-9 report due to a missing Descriptive Flex Field (DFF) value in the HR_DOCUMENTS_OF_RECORD_AUDIT table. The DFF in question is for "Assignment Number," and while it's correctly populated in the HR_DOCUMENTS_OF_RECORD table, it's not being captured in the audit table. This is preventing us from retrieving the necessary assignment information for purged employees.
Our specific questions are:
- Is the DFF field for "Assignment Number" expected to be audited in the HR_DOCUMENTS_OF_RECORD_AUDIT table?
- If auditing is expected, what specific configuration steps are required to ensure this DFF value is captured in the audit table? Generic documentation has not been helpful; we need specific guidance for this DFF and table.
Tagged:
0