Acme Packet (MOSC)

MOSC Banner

Performance impact of SIP Monitor & Trace vs. Packet-trace

edited Sep 16, 2014 1:22AM in Acme Packet (MOSC) 1 commentAnswered

We've been using both trace tools for testing in our lab (the Web GUI SIP Monitor & Trace and the packet-trace CLI command that sends to a Wireshark PC) but now our Ops team wants to use one or both of these with their production 3820 and 4500 e-SBCs.  

 

I'm looking for guidance on the performance impact of using these tools on the SBC's processor resources. I have seen cautions against using SIP logging on production boxes but have not found any comments on using these two trace tools on prod systems.

 

Should we even consider using them on prod boxes or should we allow them but with limitations (such as ensuring that the filters are very specific)?

Tagged:

Howdy, Stranger!

Log In

To view full details, sign in to My Oracle Support Community.

Register

Don't have a My Oracle Support Community account? Click here to get started.

Category Leaderboard

Top contributors this month

Instructions for posting

×

1. Select a discussion category from the picklist.


2. Enter a title that clearly identifies the subject of your question.


3. In the body, insert detailed information, including Oracle product and version.


Please abide by the Oracle Community guidelines and refrain from posting any customer or personally identifiable information (PI/CI).


Cloud / Fusion customers - Our Cloud community has moved! Please go to Cloud Customer Connect .


New to My Oracle Support Community? Visit our Welcome Center

MOSC Help Center