Angela Bayliss · Senior Solution Architect · Silver Crown

Of course there isn't. NetSuite is really lacking in continuity sometimes. Egads!! My apologies. However, if you're trying to send the email to the employee who created it, I would choose 'created by' from my options. See if that works for you?

THis is not something that can be done natively or with a workflow. You could script this, the only other thing is to retrain and ensure users are not entering spaces. Sorry it's not the answer you want.

On the recipients from results, try 'entity'. That should do the trick. 😉

The only way to remove the JE from the 'apply' subtab, is to edit the JE, and in the 'Name' field, clear the vendor name. Thats it. Edit the JE, remove the vendor name from the name field, save the JE. Voila! It won't appear on the vendor as a transaction anymore. I hope this helps!

You won't be able to restrict the created by to anyone but all active users. You can add the filter of 'Sales Rep', and filter by sales reps only, if desired. I hope this helps!

Hey Sam, To understand integrations, you need to understand some basics first. If you're using a custom built API - meaning you are going to build it from scratch- you would use Oath. If you're using a middleware (the one I know most about) you will need: An Employee record with a login (I often use Integration 1, or the…

Awesome. Some of the layers are buried in odd places. Glad I could help!

(I also check the script logs for the time the unexpected error of death appears with any regularity - reproducible I mean)

Your filter is restricting records to item receipts only - so the 'applying transaction' will give you a reference as to what the associated vendor bill is, but it won't provide you with the details of the bill. What specific results are you trying to return? The details of the bill and the item receipts that apply? Or the…

You're very welcome. Sorry it's not clean and pretty - sometimes the truth kicks rocks. It is what it is though - Merging items isn't something I believe will happen. Good luck!

There are many layers within NetSuite, so there are multiple ways to do this. The simplest way - if you want all employees with full access to see the equipment records - is to update the Custom record permission level to 'No Permissions needed' - but that doesn't sound like what you want. Are you trying to provision…

Did you edit the subsidiaries and apply the new Nexus to them? I missed this once, took me a couple days to find. So many layers in NetSuite! I hope this helps!

C

Hi @Dext3r I forget sometimes that you're a developer. In your testing, try this: Create a new custom field as a transaction body. You can display it on the items subtab. It should be the list of 'Aliases' you have. (I'm assuming that the Alias is also a list of values). Now, when you choose an 'alias' item in the custom…

Hi @Dext3r , Any unexpected error especially Sitebuilder - I would personally get a case filed. But that's just me. I'm not helpful today, sorry.

When you are processing the refund, there is a screen that pops up that says :refund customer or Charge Card - the box used to appear in the upper right corner of the screen. Sort of an 'Are you sure' prior to charging the card. My question is - did you see and click on that box to actually run the card? Are you able to…

There are a couple possible reasons: THe card wasn't refunded The card isn't valid The fields on the customer refund transaction aren't visible on the form. There are more possibilities than I care to list. We need screenshots and more context to help.

You will not be able to source the items onto a transaction where the subsidiary is different than the transaction. That's your first obstacle. Can you open up the item to the different subs?

You cannot set the field with a saved search and a workflow - Here's why: On the field, you can put a formula (or a saved search to show the value. You cannot store the value on this type of field. Since you cannot store the value, a workflow won't recognize the value to set it. I'm sorry it's not the answer you want.…

But the item being returned is NOT from the PO. It's from the vendor return authorization. Just because the item was received against the Purchase order, it is being fulfilled against the RMA. The PO status will never reflect any return. The PO status is driven by PO Item Receipts and Vendor bills. The Vendor RMA (VRMA) is…

The only way around using both items in historical sales is to update all transactions to use a single item. In many cases, this isn't feasible. It might be possible to create a parent/child relationship for the 2 items. Create a new 'parent' item, and have the 2 items be children of the parent. This way, on the historical…

Hi Sam, Your alias field is free form text. Is there any reason why it isn't a list of the items instead? I ask this because NetSuite won't recognize a free form text as an item, but it will recognize an actual item instead. So, when you search an 'alias' if the field is an actual item, you should be able to source it.…

If the items contained on the planned orders have a department or class assigned to them, and the PO lines have the department/ class field on the PO, then these segments should appear on the PO lines automatically. If you're trying to set them on the header, you may need a workflow to set them on the PO's after record…

It is not possible to have a custom segment (or a regular location, department or subsidiary) to only post to one half of the depreciation entry. The reason for this is that the depreciation entry sources the data for the depreciation from the asset record. If the asset record has a custom segment or a native segment, it…

The purchase order status will not change to reflect any type of RMA. It's the RMA status that will change when it's fulfilled and credited. While the RMA is a linked record, it's a new transaction with it's own status. I hope this helps!

Correct. THe new workflow should have tolerance amounts that are editable - so incorporating the conditions into the new workflow should be straightforward. Good luck - let us know if you run into issues.

This is more common than you think. These are the steps I would use when dealing with this specific issue: If both of these items are non inventory, then it makes things MUCH easier. Choose the item record that you want to 'retire'. On that item, update the item name to include INV, DNU - whatever it is that communicates…

If the RSM bundle is no longer available, look for the free bundle from TechFino

Have you cleared your internet cache lately? Did you click on the Oracle Icon in the upper left corner of the screen to get the page load time data? Will you please share that data with us?

Ah. I think this may be native behavior. You may need to file a case… Unless one of the Oracle people here can confirm whether this is native behavior or an enhancement. Sorry I'm not more help.