Hi @Betsy Vance , Thank you for posting again in the community! Our gurus/members will check on this and get back for any updates. To everyone, feel free to share your thoughts! -Mikko

Hi Ari @Ari Heitner , can you check if the role/user on the Web Service can access the records on the result of your query? -Mikko

How's it going, @Anderson4224 ? -Mikko

How's it going, BN @User_IJB6M ? -Mikko

hi @ejallego_ , did we answer your concern? -Mikko

Hi Renan @Renan Dantas , how's it going? -Mikko

How's it going, @User_668NO ? -Mikko

In terms of speed, there is no specific documentation explicitly say that it is faster than the previous data source since they are using different data sources. I could only advise to improve the query used for the data extraction. Additionally, since you can use the previous data source, I would suggest to try the…

Hi @Benjamin Paul - USA , This would not work as the Startswith option only uses 1 value for parameter. Try to create the search on the UI first to check if the filter would be possible. For the objective, would the following filter works for you? filters: [ [["name","startswith","005"],"OR",["name","startswith","003"]] ],…

You are correct that both articles accomplishes the same thing. You have to know what process of saving the Production Date value takes place then use the action on the element of that page and incorporate it to a script. On the first error, could you share the script having this error? Please exclude confidential…

Hi @User_7PN92 , Thank you for posting in the community! Our gurus/members will look into your concern and update for any findings. To everyone, feel free to comment your ideas! -Mikko

Hi @Betsy Vance , Thank you for posting again in the community! Our gurus/members will check on this and get back with more information. To everyone, feel free to share your thoughts! -Mikko

Hi @Ans America , Thank you for posting in the community! Please allow some time for the gurus/members to look into your concern and get back with more information. To everyone, feel free to share your thoughts! -Mikko

Hi @PaulFleetwood , Thank you for posting again in the community! What action are you executing to encounter this error? Possibly, it is due to script or workflow. You may check the deployed script/workflow one by one on the Scripted Records. If possible, try to undeploy all the workflows first to determine if it is script…

Do you still need assistance on this concern, @User_C6XDE ? -Mikko

You may have to use script on this case. You may want to check this article for similar scenario. Let us know if this helps. -Mikko

Hi @PaulFleetwood , Thank you for posting again in the community! Please allow some time for the gurus/members to look into your concern and update for any findings. To everyone, feel free to comment your ideas! -Mikko

Hi @User_R6WMC , Thank you for posting in the community! Please allow some time for the gurus/members to check on this and get back with more information. To everyone, feel free to share your thoughts. -Mikko

Did we answer your concern, @NKusiak ? -Mikko

Hi @Benjamin Paul - USA , have you submitted a support ticket? -Mikko

You are welcome! With that, do you still need further assistance on this concern? I can only advise to add a vote on the enhancements provided on the previous comment. -Mikko

Would you be able to submit a support ticket so they could check further if this is a potential defect. -Mikko

I noticed on log line 4 the DATETIMEZ value. Isn't this the value expected? Try to use the value here into the ones that errors out on log line 1. -Mikko

Instead of using accesskey on the header, can you try using Authorization? Also, you may want to check some sample headers on this article. -Mikko

BN @User_IJB6M , does the script have context condition? E.g UI/Web Service/RESTlet/etc. Also, can you try the function using the afterSubmit? -Mikko

It seems this is a parent-child relationship record. You may want to check this article instead. Would utilizing the UI to hide the field and then retrieve using SuiteScript be feasible on your end? -Mikko

Thank you for sharing your insights @Ivan Griggs UK ! Hi @Anderson4224 , this concern is related to Enhancement # 192212 - Lists > Relationships > Customers > Edit: Ability to update Opening Balance via UI, CSV Import or Web Services. The workaround provided was to create journal entries to update customer balances…

Hi @Anderson4224 , What operation are you using? Also, the available values for CreditHoldOverride are: _auto, _on, _off. -Mikko

Hi @User_B6T7M , may we know what is the process on how you input the value to the Custom Line Field? Also, is the Custom Field Store Value checked on the customization? -Mikko

For this concern, it is best to coordinate with Tableau team. You may also want to explore using TBA with SuiteAnalytics. See this article for reference. -Mikko