Categories
- All Categories
- 15 Oracle Analytics Sharing Center
- 14 Oracle Analytics Lounge
- 211 Oracle Analytics News
- 42 Oracle Analytics Videos
- 15.7K Oracle Analytics Forums
- 6.1K Oracle Analytics Idea Labs
- Oracle Analytics User Groups
- 78 Oracle Analytics Trainings
- 14 Oracle Analytics Data Visualizations Challenge
- Find Partners
- For Partners
Oracle Analytics Data Visualization Types: Your choice!
Comments
-
Thanks Philippe,
This is useful information. On what you referenced in the youtube posts, I take it the Graph Functions being referenced are not related to the new Oracle 23c Graph Offering but rather the Legacy Graph offering from Oracle?
Any additional information you have to help paint the picture here would be appreciated.
Come on Oracle, now's your chance to take market leadership and get ahead of the competition !!
0 -
@Ciaran ,
If you mean the new SQL/PGQ language added to SQL and part of the Oracle database 23c, you can already use it right now because it is "just" SQL. You can create a dataset and use it (because SQL/PGQ results are like a table with columns and rows as they come from SQL).
If you expect to run "interactive" graph queries from a workbook, this would be a full overlap with Graph Studio and the Oracle Graph Web Application which both already works with SQL/PGQ and PGQL against Graph Server or the database (PGQL and SQL/PGQ).
0 -
Thank you Gianni for the clarity on the PGQ usage, this helps.
We'd love for Oracle to take the approach of utilizing it already front of house Visual Analytics platform (OAC/OAS) in the Graph space.
This way the interactivity possibility between the types of content created would have a far more hands on business benefit. Graphs by them selves are useful but they become extremely useful if we can have them operate alongside traditional BI Content.
Having the customer use multiple tools to answer business questions can be frustrating and leave enterprise teams like my own the difficulty of somehow integrating.
Oracle Graph Web Application is also housed on Weblogic which may be useful.
1 -
I do see your point.
The Graph Web Application is purely java and doesn't really use anything of Weblogic (that's also why it is more often deployed on Tomcat or it is self-hosted on an embedded Tomcat when you run it directly from the Graph Server installation): no need to pay a Weblogic license.
I believe the graph team did work on the APEX support for their products, so APEX is meant to more easily be able to use graphs for queries and some form of analysis.
The issue I can imagine with DV having to support graphs is that it will "break" the separation between physical sources and analytical platform: DV does use the BI Server in the background, which is source agnostic. Adding something in DV that would be "only" available with an Oracle database 23c (SQL/PGQ) would be a big change of paradigm with some analytics capabilities only available if you do use that exact source.
Even the current graph limited support is done bypassing the limit of the source: any source can be used, because the data is loaded on an Oracle database in the backend and the methods of the OPG_APIS PL/SQL package are executed there before to send back the result as a "table" (with columns and rows).
And that's why you can already use the 23c SQL/PGQ, because it is just SQL and therefore can be used to create dataset directly. And any visualization in DV is designed to work with tabular results: columns and rows.
There is also another aspect to keep in mind: SQL/PGQ is not fully a property graph solution. It is called "operational property graph" because the purpose is to execute known, pre-defined, graph pattern matching queries on live relational data. This is very different compared to Graph Server and PGQL where you can execute algorithms, modify the graph on the fly and do exploration to try to find something useful, but everything is done on a snapshot (static) of data that doesn't reflect the source data in real time.
With this in mind, a DV dataset based on a SQL/PGQ statement would already fully fit in the idea of the operational property graph that is SQL/PGQ.
Because SQL/PGQ is part of the standard SQL, there should be other databases that are going to support it. Maybe at that time some special kind of visualization that will work only with a connection to a database with SQL/PGQ support will be added to enable some kind of exploration of the graph. Currently I didn't try but the network visualization would also already work with a SQL/PGQ dataset.
In the meantime I believe (this is my understanding based on what product managers of graph and oracle analytics said here and there) the idea is more that Graph Studio or Graph Web application (and also notebooks) are used for exploration, discover (ideally connected to Graph Server to get the full power of graph analysis), while DV datasets can be used to display and integrate with other sources the result of a SQL/PGQ query.
4 -
Bullet graphs
2 -
Nice one. I vote for it for sure!
1 -
ia
Thanks Gianni, your response detail and effort is greatly appreciated. Calling out the practical separation between 'SQL/PGQ' and pure 'PGQL' particularly the value add Algorithms.
For me it's the emphasis on "Complete Analytical Analysis" and not having to jump between multiple visual exploration tools to garner insights.
I would love to see Oracle come together on this approach and follow as you suggested and maybe some day have the PGQL Source specific Graph Interactions available in Oracle Analytics.... even if the initial step was to include the Graph Studio Capabilities within the same Product Suite.
There's a an opportunity here for Oracle to complete the journey......... "Customer / Analyst Focus"
3 -
Also from a OAS Scope / source support perspective there is already a precedence here with OAS supporting the likes of Essbase Hierarchy navigations or incoming AI Interactions (Custom source specific capabilities).
I'm not expecting answers to this specifically, only conveying my hopes.
1 -
Would like to see the row expander visual like Excel and Power BI has. Being able to collapse and expand data is needed when working with large volume of data.
1 -
@User_CMGSU Good one, I believe we have it for hierarchy but it might be good to have something similar. Any picture you can provide would help.
1