Welcome to the Oracle Analytics Community: Please complete your User Profile and upload your Profile Picture
Comments
-
Hi @Vismay Barot , You might want to check the data type of the Sales Representative Location column. It looks like you’ve applied a filter value of 18, which is numeric, but the column might actually be stored as text. That type mismatch is likely causing the ORA-01722: invalid number error.
-
Thank you for sharing both the approaches! I’ll go with the first one — the workaround where you calculate the difference between the earliest and the latest date before applying the rank. I think this should address what I was trying to achieve in data flows. Appreciate your help!
-
Happy to help! 😊
-
Hi @Gianni Ceresa, Thanks for checking — yes, I’d like the RANK to start with 1, as my intent is to filter on Rank = 1 to keep only the rows with the earliest date.
-
Thanks for the details. The formula is correct, but seeing 2 for person 2333 likely means there are duplicate rows in the source table. This can happen if another column differs, even with the same person and assignment. I believe rewriting the formula to handle duplicates would be the right approach.
-
Hi, You can use the TOPN function to get the MAX date. It should do the trick! TOPN(CAST("SCST - Savings Impact Reporting"."Time"."Snapshot Date" AS DATE), 1) = 1 Let me know if you face any challenges while implementing it.
-
I think Data Flows internally use Logical SQL, and as far as I know, it doesn’t support the ORDER BY function directly — which might be why it’s not working as expected.
-
Hi,I do have a working solution for this, but it’s built using Data Flows. Would you like me to share the details of that approach?
-
Hi, Thank you for looking into this. I just gave it a try, but I’m getting the following error: Near <ORDER>: Syntax error [nQSError: 26012] Any idea what might be causing this? Thanks again for your help!
-
Hi @Raghavendra Raghunath-Oracle Thank you for the prompt response. Here is the snapshot of the formula I created named ‘Offers Accepted’. Could you please confirm if this looks correct? In this case, the requisition I filtered has 3 openings, and I can confirm all 3 positions are filled with the current phase and state as…
-
Hi, kudos on all these changes—especially the Openings Left to Fill metric, which was very much needed. At my organization, recruitment leadership also considers roles that are in the current phases 'Offer 'and state -'Accepted,' as well as applications under 'Post-Offer Checks' and 'HR' (excluding rejected or withdrawn…