Best Of
Re: OCW Release Update 19.28.0.0.250715 fails, looking for ins_has.mk
I ran into this too, and while I appreciate the response "not intended for Oracle Client" … this raises a HUGE question for me personally. I have an open SR about it too.
January '25 was applied without issue, April '25 was applied. All of 2024, 2023, etc. back to the original 19c.
So, i went digging … the reason WHY it is failing is that the section that executes the "make" has been moved, again. Each month it was different. WHY?
January '25 CPU:
37262208/37257886/37268031/etc/config/actions.xml
<oracle.has.db.cvu opt_req="O" version="19.0.0.0.0">
<copy backup_in_zip="false" file_name="cv/cvdata/cvu_prereq.xml_db" name="cvu_prereq.xml" path="%ORACLE_HOME%/cv/cvdata" retain_permission="true" shaolue="6EA609ABC1738B54145FC6ADD37329FBCBB1E113"/>
</oracle.has.db.cvu>
Make located in: oracle.rhp.common
April '25 CPU:
37591516/37641958/37654975/etc/config/actions.xml
<oracle.has.db.cvu opt_req="O" version="19.0.0.0.0">
<copy backup_in_zip="false" file_name="cv/cvdata/cvu_prereq.xml_db" name="cvu_prereq.xml" path="%ORACLE_HOME%/cv/cvdata" retain_permission="true" shaolue="6EA609ABC1738B54145FC6ADD37329FBCBB1E113"/>
</oracle.has.db.cvu>
Make located in: oracle.has.crs
July '25 CPU:
37952382/37957391/37962946/etc/config/actions.xml
<oracle.has.db.cvu opt_req="O" version="19.0.0.0.0">
<copy backup_in_zip="false" file_name="cv/cvdata/cvu_prereq.xml_db" name="cvu_prereq.xml" path="%ORACLE_HOME%/cv/cvdata" retain_permission="true" shaolue="6EA609ABC1738B54145FC6ADD37329FBCBB1E113"/>
<make change_dir="%ORACLE_HOME%/srvm/lib" make_file="ins_srvm.mk" make_target="install_srvm"/><make change_dir="%ORACLE_HOME%/racg/lib" make_file="ins_has.mk" make_target="install"/>
</oracle.has.db.cvu>
Notice that the "make" commands now exist in "oracle.has.db.cvu", the last few that I have checked, they existed in different components. Perhaps there is a logical explanation. But this becomes a moving target and hard to justify to any type of auditor why the OCW is now stuck at 19.27.0.0 when everything else has move to 19.28.0.0
Moving the "make change_dir" out of "oracle.has.db.cvu", I was able to successfully apply this patch, which maybe is NOT ideal … Since though it exists on Oracle Client, but "it isn't required" … what options actually exist?
Re: Can HMR modify the SIP Method?
Hello,
It is written in HMR configuration guide, that manipulation cannot change one method to another. I was checking log.sipd and came across a system message, that the CSeq field and RURI field itself are somehow protected against such manipulations as well as From/To tag uri-parameters.
Regards,
Daureen
Re: Unable to create requisition for Description based item through work order in EAM
Can you please provide the error messages ?
If not present in the Req Import output report then use this query:
SELECT POE.COLUMN_NAME,
POE.ERROR_MESSAGE,
RQI.INTERFACE_SOURCE_LINE_ID,
RQI.WIP_ENTITY_ID,
RQI.TRANSACTION_ID,
RQI.PROCESS_FLAG,
RQI.AUTHORIZATION_STATUS,
RQI.DELIVER_TO_LOCATION_ID,
RQI.PREPARER_ID,
RQI.DESTINATION_ORGANIZATION_ID,
RQI.DESTINATION_TYPE_CODE,
RQI.SOURCE_TYPE_CODE,
RQI.LINE_TYPE_ID,
RQI.ITEM_ID,
RQI.NEED_BY_DATE,
RQI.QUANTITY,
RQI.UNIT_PRICE
FROM PO_REQUISITIONS_INTERFACE_ALL RQI,
PO_INTERFACE_ERRORS POE
WHERE RQI.WIP_ENTITY_ID in
(select wip_entity_id
from wip_entities
where wip_entity_name = '&WO_Number')
AND RQI.TRANSACTION_ID = POE.INTERFACE_TRANSACTION_ID(+)
AND RQI.INTERFACE_SOURCE_CODE = 'EAM';
Regards,
Florin
Re: Unable to create requisition for Description based item through work order in EAM
Where do i need to enter the deliver location @SriniS-Oracle, @Piyush-Oracle
Re: Unable to create requisition for Description based item through work order in EAM
Department definition.
Re: When will the OLAM ansible playbook code be upgraded to support 2.3 and OL9?
I opened a new issue @
Thanks
Jim Davis
Re: Where is Windows Patch for oracle 19.28?
OJVM Patches being incorporated into the DB Patches with 21c and newer is not a "fix", it's simply a change in delivery method (which has been used for the past decade). There is nothing to "fix", as there is nothing "broken".
Upgrading from a Long Term Support release to a Feature Release, just to have a difference in patch delivery method is not a "fix", and would not be recommended as such by Oracle Support.
Re: eProcurement and OBN/OSN Oracle Business Network integration
HI Stacy,
Thanks for posting your question to the SCM community.
If other customers/partners have implemented OBN , I encourage you to share your feedback or provide any insights.
Thanks,
Wael
