Best Of
Re: Is anyone using auto-approvals for reported time, but only for a specific subset of time reporters?
Zee - great response my friend, and I have had past clients who wanted this issue, and so I made Workgroups to isolate the sub-group and then went into AWE and cloned delivered, then added logic for approval step to fire without having to make new TRCs. It is best to turn off the parent and then modify the specific kid to meet your approval needs. I look forward to seeing what others have to say on this issue. Have a great day.
David L
DHLuding
Re: How to receive all records in daily digest
This is documented here:
"The maximum number of messages in a single daily digest depends on the length of the messages. The system will send up to the latest 100 messages in single daily digest. The older messages will be removed and will not be included in the digest."
I'd argue that if you have a user getting 100+ notifications per day, they'll probably want to log into Unifier to see them. If you do want a workaround to show everything, maybe you can build a UDR that shows all open tasks assigned to that user, and schedule it to run every day?
Re: Due date editable in one step
The Due Date field is only editable on the creation step if the user is allowed to over ride it. It is not editable after the creation step.
Who is using Oracle Guided Learning (OGL) with Unifier?
I've started playing around with OGL and am wondering if anyone has implemented and would like to connect?
Thanks!
Re: Strange Font Being Experienced by Users
Hello 1976276
We are confirmed the same problem.
■Only in IE
■Windows 10
■Characters break if used for a long time
■Rebooting the browser solves the problem.
You may encourage end users to use a different browser.
Re: Hello my DBA's i getting ORA-12801 for one of my internal reports
Hi,
When you need to check the situation ASAP, first calm down.
What Oracle and OS are you using? What versions? Under what circumstances does this error occur?
The following document contains information about analysis.
How to Analyze an ORA-12801 (Doc ID 1187823.1)
Regards,
asahide
Re: Patch 36581188 Bug Subject vs. Bug Resolution Text
Hello,
Development responded back to me with the following in regards to revising the information in 25-C:
Bug 36581188 is scheduled for delivery with TU 25-C. Below are the revised Bug subject and Resolution text for this Bug.
Bug subject: PENNSYLVANIA WITHHOLDING INCORRECT WHEN MA RESIDENT WORKS IN MA AND PA AND PAID BONUS ON MULTIPLE CHECKS
Resolution text:
Patch 36581188 modifies PSPUSTAX.CBL, PSPTCALC.CBL and PSPPYNET.CBL and copy member PSCGRSWK.CBL to correctly calculate Pennsylvania withholding tax for an employee in the following situation:
-The employee is a resident of Massachusetts and works in Pennsylvania & Massachusetts; and
-The employee is paid annualized and supplemental earnings on a confirmed off-cycle check; and
-The employee is paid annualized and supplemental earnings on an on-cycle check in the same pay calendar as the off cycle check; and
-The employee is subsequently paid supplemental earnings on an on-cycle separate check.
Prior to the modifications, the Pennsylvania state withholding tax was incorrectly calculated on the on-cycle separate check for this situation.
Regards,
Re: Patch 36581188 Bug Subject vs. Bug Resolution Text
Hello,
I am getting clarification from Development on Bug 36581188 based on the information indicated in the readme file of the PRP.
I will update once I receive a response back from them.
Regards,


