Hi @Velu Angusamy and @LDC-Oracle,

Thanks for trying to help here, actually your inputs helped us creating the servlet filter for the identification of the redirection and make it work as per our requirement.

It was went live by the end of Oct 2025 and working fine since then.

Thanks for the clue once again.

Regards,
Matheshwaran V

Hello PencilBoy99,

While we wait for other customers to share their experiences, please check the following PeopleBook reference:

https://docs.oracle.com/cd/G17334_01/fscm92pbr52/eng/fscm/eewf/UnderstandingtheProcessFlowoftheEventsandNotificationsFramework-227fef.html?pli=ul_d313e41_eewf

It explains the functionality with examples.

This Events and Notifications Framework is primarily used to support event-driven integrations within PeopleSoft. It allows you to define business events in the application—the “publishers”—and then have “subscribers” (often external systems or other PeopleSoft modules) perform actions in response, frequently via Integration Broker.

@NCSU1 - Yes, there is an easy way to delete EONC Events and IDs - even delivered ones. However, I am tired of giving out free information not knowing who the recipient is. Your profile is completely empty. What is the name of your company/organization? Are you an FTE or a "consultant"? (sorry, I was grouchy)

Here are the steps:

Data Migration Workbench
Add a new DMW project
Insert data set = EONC_NOTIFICATION_EVENTS
Search for your NC Event
Search Results: check the box to select your NC Event
Insert Related Data Sets: check the box to select EONC_NOTIFICATIONS
Press the 'Insert and Return' button
On the DMW project main page, press the 'Update Project Action' button
Change the action from 'Copy' to 'Delete'
Copy to File
In the target environment, go to Data Migration Workbench
Click the 'Load Project from File' link
Select your project file and press 'Load'
Submit for Copy

Side note: the Oracle KB document you mentioned is for EOEN, which is older than EONC and not the same thing. It is confusing IMO since it has almost the same name - Notification Framework vs. Notification Composer.

Instead of using two websites why not to use a sigle public site where everybody can get in

Except few of them maybe. E.g Reject admins to get in from public, while for these "educated users" set a separate non-public path to get in. That way no redirects are neded and your current problem is solved…

That is a waste of resources and few problems cannot be overpassed with such two sites setup using same or diffrent portals doesnt matter.

You just mentioned one user problem here.

But imagine you have to populate (for the serach framework purpose) the default local node URIs with the URI value of your site.

What site URI you will chose in this case? public or non-public? as far the default local node it is only one per DB and you have there two sites to deal with!

As educated users as admins dont need search to work you will chose definetly the public site.