Best Of
Alternate Approvers for specific people/specific approval stop (using T&E as an example)
Looking for input on how to handle the following scenarios using delivered functionality:
- We have a Dept supervisor who wants to delegate their approval authority for their direct reports to another person. Delegation will not work because if they’re also setup as an Expense Approver, it would auto-reassign those transactions as well. And we cannot override the Supervisor on their T&E Profile because the Employee Sync overrides this.
2. Somewhat similar to #1, an agency wants a specific person approving the HR Supervisor stop for a list of 10 people. This specific example is they want the CFO approving all Section Director’s travel, and when the CFO submits an ER it goes to a specific person to approve. Again, we cannot just update the Supervisor on their T&E profile because the Employee Sync overrides this setup, and Delegation will not work because we do not want it all-encompassing for that person in the module.
3. Similar to #2 but for when the Expense Manager submits an ER, when it gets to the Expense Manager stop they want their ER’s being approved by a specific person. We do not want to set this user up in general because then they’ll get all ER’s for that stop assigned to them, and Delegation/Alternate User doesn’t work because it would be all-encompassing for that user—it needs to only be for when that specific user (who is the primary Expense Manager for the agency) submits an ER, when it gets to the Expense Manager stop it needs to be assigned to a specific person to approve.
Primary vs Backup Approvers
We need the ability to assign backup approvers for specific routings but do not want them enabled/active until they’re actually needed, and many of them are already setup in other routings for the same step. If we assign the route controls they are backups for to their User Profile, there is no way for them to know when they need to step in and approve the applicable transactions because both their primary and backup transactions would all be assigned to them.
Delegation will not work either because it will auto-reassign every transaction for a specific user per module. We do not want it all-encompassing for a specific user, but rather for a specific routing. For example, within an agency’s section Approver A is set up to approve Routings 1, 2 and 3 based on a combination of Dept ID, Project or SpeedChart (Dept/Proj/Activity combo) used. They have specific people qualified to back them up in certain areas, so when they are out of office, Routing 1 needs to go to Approver B, Routing 2 needs to go to Approver C, and routing 3 needs to go to Approver D. Delegation doesn’t allow for this level of detail—it would reassign all transactions for Approver A to either Approver B, C or D. Because of the sensitivity of the data/transactions, this cannot happen.
How can we set up backup approvers for specific routings when they are also currently an active approver for a different routing, but only assign the backup transactions to them when needed? We do NOT want to have to go into Monitor Approvals and manually reassign these transactions every time someone is out of the office/inaccessible. This wouldn't work anyways because you're not able to filter on specific chartfields in Monitor Approvals. We want the functionality of Delegation but for specific routings within a module rather than all-encompassing for the module for that user. Going in and assigning the Route Control Profile to the backup's User Profile is not ideal because it doesn't take into account transactions currently assigned to the primary—this is where have the Delegation functionality would be nice so items currently assigned are also reassigned.
Thoughts on how we can handle this?
Re: How to unreconcile ext trans that was manually reconciled for bank account setup for auto recon?
Hi @User_6LSKH,
Welcome and thank you for visiting My Oracle Support Community and posting your question here! Your scenario is addressed through the following bug which is currently under Development Review: Bug 38405195 - ECM: SEMI MANUAL RECONCILIATION PAGE RECONCILES UNBALANCED EXTERNAL ENTRIES SUCCESSFULLY
Description:
Semi Manual Reconciliation page reconciles unbalanced External entries successfully when the Reference for the External entry is changed. Now, users are unable to unreconcile these reconciled entries due to this Message received: "The summed amount of transactions do not match. Amounts are different by 300.00 (9550,24)."
If this answer resolves your question, please choose the "YES" for the question at the bottom of this post, "Did this answer the question?" This will enable other Community Users to quickly identify the solution suggested and see that this post has been successfully answered.
Thank you,
Gail
How to unreconcile ext trans that was manually reconciled for bank account setup for auto recon?
Peoplesoft version 9.2, Image 47, Peopletools version 8.60.10
An external transaction for a bank account setup for auto reconciliation was accidentally reconciled on the manual reconciliation page and needs to be unreconciled. The checkbox is greyed out preventing us from unreconciling. Accounting entries were created and distributed to GL. Is there a way in the system that we can unreconcile the transaction?
Navigation: Menu > FSCM > Banking > Reconcile Statements > Manual Reconciliation
Re: Buyer number
The Buyer(address number) of the person responsible for setting up and maintaining the correct stocking levels for the item. It is used in MRP and in Purchasing as a filter field so that the buyer can go to those applications and easily locate bring up orders that fall within their responsibility. The BUYR field can have different values in the F4101 and F4102. Each branch plant record in the F4102 can also have a different value. There can only be one BUYR value for each item or item/branch record, there is no provision for multiple buyers.
Refer the document "E1: 41: Overview of the BUYER NUMBER on the Item Master and Item/Branch Record (P4101 /P41026 / BUYR) (Doc ID 629754.1)" that details its usage
Thanks
Sai
Re: can we extend or customize ECC dashboard for project management module on ebs?
i have seen this one before, that if we can extending for project management? please check the link
https://blogs.oracle.com/ebs/post/projects-enterprise-command-center-overview
Re: JVM for our AIS server are going into failed status after stuck threads
Hello Omkar,
In the J2EE log (or out), when a stuck thread is reported will also report the action being performed for the outbound connections (e.g. external Rest API, (S)FTP connections etc. You will not see this for direct database operations (as I mentioned earlier for Connectors which are using database Connections).
However, generating a Java Thread Dump and searching for the thread being reported as stuck, you will see the stack of that thread. Look on top of the stack and check if the Java class methods are related to the database operations.
As I said, in case you are only fetching data in AIS through Form Requests or Data Requests, these will go through JAS. AIS will directly fetch the data only through the database connections.
The JAS server depends on AIS only when there are E1Pages which are executed through AIS server and because the AIS server encounters stuck threads, the JAS server running the E1Pages will encounter also stuck (or delayed) threads.
I will let the engineer assigned to the SR to work with you on this case.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Cezar
UK Announcement: Statutory Neonatal Care Pay and Leave Changes April 2025 Patch was Released.
Dear Customer,
The following patch is now available to download and apply via My Oracle Support:
· R12.2 : Patch 38222349:R12.PAY.C - HRGlobal
· R12.1 : Patch 38222349:R12.PAY.B - HRGlobal*
This patch delivers Statutory Neonatal Care Pay and Leave Changes effective April 2025 (effective from 6th April 2025).
Tax year changes patch for 2024-2025 is a pre-requisite for SNCP patch. Hence ensure TYE patch is already applied.
TYE patch for 2024-2025 is: Patch 37484197
Post Install Steps need to be run after patch installation. The patch Readme has important installation, setup instructions and guidelines. Please refer to MOS
Note 3103000.1 for further details (Oracle HRMS for UK - Statutory Neonatal Care and Pay Changes Effective 06 April 2025 (Doc ID 3103000.1)
Thank you,
Oracle EBS UK Payroll Support
Re: UK Announcement Statutory Neonatal Care Leave&Pay: Release ETA and Support Team Readiness
Hello,
Patch was released:
https://community.oracle.com/mosc/discussion/4591443/uk-announcement-statutory-neonatal-care-pay-and-leave-changes-april-2025-patch-was-released/p1?new=1
Thanks,
Lucian
