Best Of
Re: Siebel Administrative tasks that support rest API
Regarding your question, there is no documentation available for Siebel Administrative tasks that can be executed by REST.
It is known that some operations can be executed via SMC related to Configuration and Management, but it is not comprehensive.
Please note there is an existing ER that was raised a few years back, there is still no progress on its implementation, see:
Is It Possible to Start New Siebel Component Tasks / Jobs Via Server Management Console or REST API? (Doc ID 2847937.1)
To express your interest in such feature, please raise a SR on MOS and request your SR to be associated with the ER mentioned on the document above.
Regards,
Michael Harada
Re: Error P4114 COSE 1017& HTTP 504
Dear 2011,
I have another question as well. If you are using the P4114, why is the F4211EditLine business function getting called? This would be called for Sales transactions. As mentioned above, it would be better to troubleshoot this issue on a service request so we can review the steps you are taking and to get detailed logging for this issue.
Regards,
Michael
Re: Report publisher doesn not create PDF
Hi @2011,
Thank you for visiting My Oracle Support Community and posting your question here! I want to let you know I have moved your thread to our Design Tools & Output Technologies - JDE1 (MOSC) subcategory for those subject matter experts to engage.
If an answer resolves your question, please choose the "YES" on that comment for "Did this answer the question?".
Thanks,
Gail
When entering a Journal Import with a closed date a journal number is returned but no journal
When using JRNL1_WS import, both import now and write to file, if one of the users inadvertently uses a closed date, it will process. It will return a journal number but the journal will not exist. Is this going to be fixed? Does anyone else have this issue? I would expect a return message such as an error notice. Some times it will take the next consecutive number, and other times it will use a number like 800, 900 or in the 1000 (we are in 663391). But mostly it take the next consecutive number.
My concern is this uses up a journal number and I would think auditors will have an issue with this. and of course, the user who isn't careful, will think their data is entered when it's not. Thoughts?
Re: Error P4114 COSE 1017& HTTP 504
Hello,
This is caused because the associated kernel either crashes or has its message queue full of messages (outstanding requests). Since this is caused by a specific Business Function (F4211FSEditLine), please open a service request with JDE Distribution.
For a list of COSE (Call Object Server Error) messages, please check the Question 2 from "E1: JAS: Exception/Error Code in JAS when Call Object Kernel Fails on Logic Server with Error Code COSE#9999 (Doc ID 1094464.1)" document.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Cezar
Re: Primary vs Backup Approvers
Hello @Joe-OMB ,
I hope all is well with you over there ;o)
Thank you for your new post into the PeopleSoft ESA Community!!
Having reviewed the scenario presented, please, find here below my feedback:
- The current delivered functionality only allows to define current approvers in the Approver Assignment set up page. There is no way to define back-up approvers in this page, that become automatically active should a primary approver be out of the office.
- The Fluid Delegations feature, while thought to enable a more transaction specific re-routings in case of absence, it does not go deep enough as to be able to configure at the routing chartfield level.
- I would definitely suggest you raise a new Enhancement Request in the PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Expenses Ideas Lab site for this topic.
- I noticed you mentioned the Monitor Approvals page in your explanation. Please, note that in the FIN Expenses module, the Monitor Approvals page should be used in Display Only mode, and never used to formally take any approval actions (Approve, Deny, Pushback, or Reassign). Those actions are not supported in this page. Instead, the Reassign Approval Work page should be used. (Navigation Path: Travel and Expenses >Manage Expenses Security > Reassign Approval Work)
As a workaround, I would suggest that the company develops a custom query where the User ID of the Approver being absent is being input, and the query returns the list of Expense Transactions currently in their queue, outstanding fr review/approval, returning also the routing chartfield being used, and the User ID of the new back-up Approver. With the report in hand, the Reassign Approval Work delivered page can be used to re-assign the transactions to the respective identified back-up approvers. The Monitor Approvals page, while non-supported in FIN Expenses, it forces the User to re-assign each transaction individually, while the Reassign Approval Work, several transactions can be re-assigned to the selected back-up approver.
While an idea, it is not perfect, and would still require manual intervention in the Reassign Approval Work page.
Let's see if other customers have had to deal with similar situations, and maybe they can share their experiences.
I hope that the information provided has clarified all your doubts. Should you have additional related questions, do not hesitate letting us know. On the contrary, if all your queries, and doubts have been successfully addressed, please make sure to mark 'YES' on the 'Did this answer the question? Yes-No' link. This will enable other Community Users to quickly identify the solution suggested, and see that this post has been successfully
answered.
Have an excellent day!
Pere Taulé
Re: Unable to store value from Rcustom header on REFER message for Extracting it in INVITE to referred
Hello All,
be aware that SBC constructs the new request-uri INVITE by extracting the whole uri-user space from Refer-To , so in order to store the values of customer headers in Refer-To header u need to add that values in uri-user-param , not uri-param because this latter one will be not carried in the request-uri of INVITE .
Also I see that value of GC_USERDATA header carries many semicolon characters , that may be a problem and potentially misunderstood by the SBC as different parameters , I've not tested but I suspect could be a problem when u r going to recall that values from the new INVITE .
Cheers
Antonio
