Best Of
Re: Using Forms to enhance ESA
Hello @Otto Schmid ,
I hope all is well with you over there ;o)
Glad to hear that my comments were of assistance, and indeed, there is lots of videos out there from other customers sharing their experiences. Hopefully, other will also contribute to this post in the coming weeks.
Have a great day!
Pere Taulé
1099 requirements for 2025 are now available through Bug 38342920, posted in My Oracle Support
For setup changes, see Doc ID 3102721.1 - EAP WTHD25: For 1099 Reporting Year 2025, What Setup is Required to Implement the IRS Changes For Forms 1099-NEC and 1099-MISC?
Note: Bug 38342920 - AP: NEW 2025 IRS REQUIREMENTS FOR REPORTING 1099-NEC/MISC, must be applied along with the required setup, before applying Bug 38479968 - 1099 Update for 2025 (Fix ETA 11/14/2025).
Re: Expense Report Oracle Maps Distance Calculator Question
Thanks, Pere! You gave me exactly what I was looking for.
As always, much appreciated.
Rick
Re: Using Forms to enhance ESA
Thank you for your feedback.
I managed to find a form in our Demo environment when using the tiles instead of the menu navigation as per your advice.
It's good to know that Customers are making use of the form functionality. I was hoping that those who are making use of them would add to this post.
Searching the Internet (which I didn't do before posting this question) yielded quite a few results of Customers, who have used this functionality, that one can contact.
It would be interesting to find out who of those Customers have used both Apex and PeopleSoft Forms to extend functionality. Since both are Oracle products, Customers have the best of both worlds. At my company we have only used Apex and not PeopleSoft Forms (yet)
Regards
Otto
Re: XMLP Return Code 13
Hello,
As I said, there could be various reasons for - "Unable to generate xmlp report. Return Code 13", like the RTF template is using a referenced subtemplate which is loaded with some delay during the RD processing, but not when republishing the RD.
First thing to check will be whether this is specific to one RD job or not.
Then, if the issue can be replicated at will, capture the BI Publisher logs and debug logs. Instructions to capture those are provided in the "E1: XMLP: How to Capture BI Publisher (BIP) Logs (Doc ID 651589.1)" document
If you are unable to figure it out yourself, open a service request with xmlp kernel debug log and xdo log.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Cezar
Re: (Re)Routing based on received RC
Hello Petr
during my quick free time I gave it a look and it works as expected , attached u can find the HMR as example .
Hope it helps u
Cheers
Antonio
Re: Button to scan asset is defined as 'Dummy'
Hi Otto, @Otto Schmid
These are not duplicates, the Enhanced Functionality has a Base Bug (Bug 37021790) and a set of Prerequisite Bugs (Bug 37029746, Bug 37029404, and many others).
Also, as a general rule, the Bug description is not always relevant and/or a single Bug # can adress multiple issues.
Normally, when using Change Assistant in creating a Change Package for a specific Enhancement/Fix, you should only input the base Bug as all the associated prerequisites should also be extracted automatically.
As we don't know your team's practice of applies fixes, if only the Base Bug is applied and you are missing the prerequisites, maybe the process needs to be revised/rechecked.
Kind regards,
George
Re: Unable to find option to print Asset QR/Bar code
Hi Otto, @Otto Schmid
These are not duplicates, the Enhanced Functionality has a Base Bug (Bug 37021790) and a set of Prerequisite Bugs (Bug 37029746, Bug 37029404, and many others).
Also, as a general rule, the Bug description is not always relevant and/or a single Bug # can adress multiple issues.
Normally, when using Change Assistant in creating a Change Package for a specific Enhancement/Fix, you should only input the base Bug as all the associated prerequisites should also be extracted automatically.
As we don't know your team's practice of applies fixes, if only the Base Bug is applied and you are missing the prerequisites, maybe the process needs to be revised/rechecked.
Kind regards,
George
Re: Using Forms to enhance ESA
Hello @Otto Schmid ,
I hope all is well with you over there ;o)
Thanks for your new post into the PeopleSoft ESA Community!!
I have seen over the years several customers making use of the Forms functionality, and implement it on their systems. In a DEMO instance, there should be some Form IDs already delivered, and ready to be reviewed/tested on:
Under the Manage Forms page, one can define the Owner IDs. Once that is done, in the Design Forms tile, the User would be able to see their design: (I logged as User ID VP1)
The 2 Form IDs that were assigned to User ID VP1 are displaying correctly:
They can be edited through the EDIT button, accessing the Wizard; or new ones can be created.
The below Knowledge Article would offer more insights on regards to the usage of Forms, Approver Builder, and how to use it:
- EC: How to Use Forms and Approver Builder ( FAB ) in PeopleSoft 9.1 and 9.2 Applications (Doc ID 1379385.1)
I hope that the information provided has clarified all your doubts. Should you have additional related questions, do not hesitate letting us know. On the contrary, if all your queries, and doubts have been successfully addressed, please make sure to mark 'YES' on the 'Did this answer the question? Yes-No' link. This will enable other Community Users to quickly identify the solution suggested, and see that this post has been successfully
answered.
Have an excellent day!
Pere Taulé
Re: Button to scan asset is defined as 'Dummy'
Hi Otto, @Otto Schmid
Thank you for your question,
Please confirm your DEMO is on min. FSCM 9.2.53 or you have applied Enhancement Bug 37021790 and all the associated prerequisite fixes? (i.e. Bug 37029404).
Ref: Bug 37029404 - SUP - RECORD - AM_PI_QRSCN_WRK- ASSET TRACKING: SCAN ASSET CODES WITH DEVICE CAMERA - 37021790
Kind regards,
George







