Best Of
Re: Combo Codes on Timesheets
I have this same concern (and have had for a long time) about using Inactive Combo Codes. I have posted a new Idea 'Disallow use of Combo Codes in Inactive Status'. This is the menu path for that idea I just posted.
Home› PeopleSoft - Ideas Lab› HCM - Human Capital Management - PSFT Ideas› HCM - Human Resources - PSFT Ideas
Re: E1 9.2 - Has anyone had the need to calculate Prevailing Wage at a subledger (work order) level?
Hello,
We code certified to work orders all the time, to link them to the rate derivation, we manually key the job number in the job location field in time entry and our certified payroll report is custom so that is how we pull it in. But we do have one company that is Readymix delivery in California and they have to report certified and we data select the PRTR to pull in that line of time entry. But the data selection is part of our custom report. Sorry i could not be more help.
Lisa
Re: Posting time delays
Hello,
While you are waiting for the Reporting Tools group to get back to you, please take a look at this KM solution and try these things and see if it helps.
E-RD: Troubleshooting Processes Remain in Posting Status (Doc ID 660047.1)
Regards,
Asif M -Oracle
Re: Partial data load
Hi,
Thank You for asking your question in the My Oracle Support Community.
There is no direct way from application HFM to TRCS to load a percentage of data, Mostly From the Datamanagement you could need to specify via the custom scripts.
Others are welcome to share their experience.
Abdul
Re: PeopleTools upgrade - issues with "Invalid Views" steps
Casey - Thanks for checking, that behavior makes sense given your findings that one particular row skips your clean up of PS_PTUPGDDDOUTPUT.
To further explain INVWBUSY row (DDDTYPE = INVWBUSY, PTP_SEQ_CHAR = V-1) is a temporary “busy flag” record used by the upgrade SQRs (like DDDINVWS.SQR) to prevent concurrent access to PS_PTUPGDDDOUTPUT. It should normally be deleted automatically at the end of a clean run, but if the previous DDDAudit or Invalid View step was interrupted or failed mid-process, the flag can remain in the table.
Snippet from dddinvws.sqc begin-SELECT
'Y' &SelIsBusy1
FROM PS_PTUPGDDDOUTPUT
WHERE DDDTYPE = 'INVWBUSY' OR DDDTYPE = 'DDDBUSY'
end-select ….. ….. ….. if $Skip_db_insert_delete = 'N'
begin-SQL on-Error=Rpt-SQL-Error
DELETE FROM PS_PTUPGDDDOUTPUT WHERE DDDTYPE = 'DDDINVWS'
end-SQL
do Commit-Transaction
end-if
Before rerunning the upgrade (or cloning Prod for a fresh run), it’s safe and recommended to run below.
DELETE FROM PS_PTUPGDDDOUTPUT WHERE DDDTYPE IN ('INVWBUSY','DDDBUSY');
DELETE FROM PS_PTUPGDDDOUTPUT WHERE DDDTYPE = 'DDDINVWS';
This ensures the invalid-view audit starts clean and doesn’t reuse stale or half-processed data from an earlier run.
You don’t need to touch the other DDDAudit result tables — just clear out PS_PTUPGDDDOUTPUT for these DDDTYPE values. The process will rebuild everything automatically when rerun.
If you’re rebuilding the environment from Prod, you can also verify there’s no preexisting PTUVIEW project data:
DELETE FROM PSPROJECTITEM WHERE PROJECTNAME='PTUVIEW'; DELETE FROM PSPROJECTDEFN WHERE PROJECTNAME='PTUVIEW';
Then rerun the PeopleTools upgrade step “Checking for Invalid Views on Microsoft.”
That should ensure the PTUVIEW project is rebuilt cleanly with only valid view names.
– Velu
Retainage in Contracts (Grants-Research) - PeopleSoft
Hi,
Can someone shed some light into applying retainage for rate-based contracts in Sponsored Programs (Grants)? People Books are very vague in regard with this topic and there is no clarification about configuration that should take place. In addition, I would like to know if retainage can also be applied on the transaction level besides the contract line level.
Any assistance will be much appreciated!
Armand
ArmandV
Re: Posting time delays
Hello User_CAK3Z,
I have moved your post to the PeopleTools and Lifecycle Management - PSFT (MOSC).
Re: Expense Report Approval Workflow
I don't think this is configurable with Expenses Workflow and probably for good reason. In theory, being able to select your approvers could open the door to collusion. Is organization Audit function (Internal or otherwise) OK with the nature of the request?
Expense Report Approval Workflow
PeopleSoft 9.2.51
Tools 8.61
I've been tasked with investigating a way to configure Expense Report Approval Workflow so that a requester can submit an Expense Report to an approver of their choice rather than letting the configuration route the report to pre-defined approvers. (Possibly a dropdown list of approvers.) ** I've been doing PeopleSoft workflow for 20+ years now, and I do not believe this is possible, however, as I've also learned in that time, you never say never with PeopleSoft.**
Any advise or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Rick


