Best Of
Announcing Oracle Solaris 11.4 SRU83
We've just released the Oracle Solaris 11.4 SRU83, the July 2025 CPU.
It is available via 'pkg update' from the support repository or by downloading the SRU from My Oracle Support Doc ID 2433412.1.
The following components have been updated to address security issues:
- Apache Tomcat to 9.0.105
- Firefox to 128.11.0esr
- MySQL to 8.4.5
- Thunderbird to 128.11.0esr
- Wireshark to 4.4.7
- c-ares to 1.34.5
- libexpat to 2.7.1
- libarchive to 3.7.9
- perl to 5.38.4
- python to 3.13.4
- squid to 6.13
- suricata to 7.0.10
- utility/screen
Full details of this SRU can be found in My Oracle Support Doc 3094197.1.
For the list of Service Alerts affecting each Oracle Solaris 11.4 SRU, see Important Oracle Solaris 11.4 SRU Issues (Doc ID 2445150.1).
ANNOUNCE: OS8.8.83 is Available on MOS!
This is to announce the release of ZFSSA AK Software OS8.8.83 (aka 2013.1 Update 8.83)
OS8.8.83 has been delivered to the external support repository and MOS
It is available on the external MOS portal, ARU # 27606522
Announce: Oracle Solaris 10 quarterly patch release - July 2025
The July 2025 Solaris 10 quarterly patch release is complete - individual patches, Recommended and CPU patchsets are available on My Oracle Support.
What's New:
- 146573-02 & 146574-02 syslogd patches
- 153339-61 & 153340-61 JavaSE 8 update 461 patches
For links to the latest CPU patchsets and more, please see:
How to find the Oracle Solaris Critical Patch Update (CPU) Patchsets, Recommended OS Patchsets for Oracle Solaris and Oracle Solaris Update Patch Bundles (Doc ID 1272947.1)
Re: Traceroute Issue in HA Architecture
Hi Antonio,
It looks fine now. We disabled it earlier due to security concerns.
Thank you very much.
YyL
Re: SPARC T5-2 parts Query
Hello and welcome to the community!
If you go to the handbook for the T5-2:
You can click on some individual parts. The backplane for example, will fit into a T4-2 but not a T4-1 or T4-4.
There's no drilldown for the SAS cables so I can't say if it's compatible, but it likely isn't because the T4's had a different SAS controller position on the MB and the cable connector is likely somewhere else so the length isn't compatible. (T4-1's use 345mm and 450mm cables, while the T5-2 uses 215mm)
T7's and T8's use a SAS3 (where T5 uses SAS2) so they are not compatible.
I hope that helps.
Toby
RHS
SPARC
Re: Large response to REGISTER due to multiple Contact headers
Hello
I did a test in my lab using SIPP and editing an INVITE to make it bigger then 4096 bytes , it works by increasing the parameter I suggested previously , if I leave it 4096 the SBC replies with 513 and the call fails .
Cheers
Antonio
Re: Receivables Fluid WorkCenter: some defined links do not appear in Payments My Work Group
Please disregard, I solved my problem.
Receivables Fluid WorkCenter: some defined links do not appear in Payments My Work Group
In Receivables Fluid WorkCenter of our DEMO PUM 5x environments, how do we make the "Direct Journals to Complete" and "Direct Journals to Budget Check" links available? I can see the definitions in Configure Pagelets, but they do not appear in the WorkCenter. Thank you, Rob
Re: Is there any difference between a 32-bit and a 64-bit PAR file for the same object?
Hello,
If we are referring to BSFNs, then there could be differences in the way the variables are declared.
For example in 32 bit source code long type will be int type, time_t will be jdetime_t and size_t will be jdesize_t.
The conversion is made automatically during the following processes:
- Package Build
- OMW check in
- ESU deployment
- Busbuild
and manually, on demand by running R9664CONV - 64-bit Code Converter.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Cezar
