Best Of
Re: Application Compablitey With OS
Tested Config:
Windows Server 2019 is compatible with
- SQL Server (2017 & 2019)
- Oracle DB (19.3, 18.3, 12.2.0.1
- WLS 12.2.1.4
Hope that helps - all details in the link above
David
PMO
EDIT: Server 2022 not listed in tested config, so if you're looking at servers of 2022, you'll need to upgrade your version of P6 as well
David
Re: Copy a Table Conversion UBE
Review following documents:
E1: OMW: TC: Unable To Copy Any Table Conversions in OMW in Tools 9.2.5.X (Error : SQL0913 - ROW OR OBJECT F98761US IN USE) (AS400 Only) (Doc ID 2832954.1)
E1: OMW: TC: Unable To Copy Any Table Conversions in OMW, OMW is Frozen and then Crashes (SQL DB) (Doc ID 2918155.1)
Can Links to Fluid Pages on the Fluid Expense Workcenter Open without leaving the Workcenter?
We are looking into implementing the Fluid Expenses Workcenter and when testing setting up configuration in a test environment on Image 54 with PeopleTools 8.60.10. After adding new links that take the user to fluid pages like the Create Expense Report, My Expense Reports, and My Wallet fluid pages, if you click the link from the workcenter it takes the user out of the workcenter page (still within the same browser tab) and into the page the link should take them to. Links to Classic pages leave the user on the workcenter page but still open the page displayed to the right of the workcenter grouplets. I thought one of the purposes of the workcenter is so a user could remain on the workcenter page and do all their work tasks from one location. Is the only workaround to set the Link to open in a new window?
Inquiry on Availability of IRS Consolidated Per Diem Rate File for CONUS (FY-2026)
Hi Everyone,
I would like to check when the IRS consolidated Per Diem rate file for CONUS is typically made available for download and use in the PeopleSoft system.
I am currently referring to the following link to download the CONUS file for FY-2026 in ASCII format; however, the FY-2026 file is not yet available for pull and upload through the delivered CONUS functionality:
Per Diem Rate Lookup – DoD Travel
Steps followed:
- Navigate to the link above.
- Under CONUS Rates, select Fiscal Year = 2026 and File Type = ASCII, then click Submit.
- Download the file (ASCII format).
If anyone has experience with loading or using the delivered CONUS functionality for hotel/lodging expenses, could you please share when the CONUS file for each fiscal year usually becomes available for loading into PeopleSoft?
Thanks,
Abhishek
Re: What Event is used when Configuring New Email Notifications to Remind Users to Take Action?
Hi Pere
There appears to be some confusion as to what is a customization and what is a configuration.
As far as I understand, a customization is any change made using Application Designer that alters delivered PeopleSoft objects beyond delivered configuration options
A configuration is any change made using Setup pages, without altering delivered code or delivered objects.
Adding a new custom Event into the Approval Setup page, (Transaction Configuration) would therefore NOT be regarded as a customization but a configuration.
The enhancement request you refer to (EEX: Is there a Way to Notify Approver via Email if They Do Not Take Action on An Expense Transaction for More Than Specified Period? (Doc ID 1297246.1)) was logged in 2012. This makes sense because in 2012 AWE was in its infancy.
However now that we are in 2025 one could expect that applying a configuration in AWE would successfully integrate with the Expenses module?It is quite concerning that that this does not appear to be the case?
Looking forward to your reply
Regards
Otto
Re: local Policy - From Parent Realm to Child Realm
Hello
the main point here is how to match the source realm ,in order to make the appropriate decisions for an incoming request the source, or ingress, realm needs to be determined. The SBC may go through 4 steps:
1) The request comes through a specific Network Interface (slot, port and VLAN). If there is only one realm bound to this Network Interface the process is complete. However, the SBC supports Overlapping IP (OLIP) by allowing more than one realm to be bound to the same Network-Interface.
In this case –-> 2
2) The SBC looks at the source IP address and compares it with the list of configured Session Agents’ IP addresses. If there is a match, the SBC takes the realm of the matching SA as the ingress realm.
Otherwise –-> 3
3) The SBC looks at the packet’s ingress sip-port/sip- interface (i.e. destination address of the flow). A SIP interface is attached to a realm, so the process is complete, unless we have a case where nested realms share the same SIP-Interface.
In this case –-> 4
4) The SBC looks at the source IP address and compares it with the addr-prefix parameter of all the realms. A match will finally determine the ingress realm.
Do u have configured SA on public side of your environment ? in that case ( step 2 ) did u configured the exact child realm on that SA ?
Is it an access-backbone scenario ? in that case ( step 4 ) did u have configured addr-prefix parameter on the child-realm with the source-ip address of the requesting endpoints ?
If both cases are not present , because there are no SA or because it's hard to recognize several dynamic source public addresses , u can consider to configure child realms with their own sip-interface , in that case it should fall in step 3 .
Hope it helps
Cheers
Antonio
Re: local Policy - From Parent Realm to Child Realm
Ok my scenario is this:
i. parent realm1 - has 2 sip ports to the public. these sip ports have ip address x.x.x.x and y.y.y.y.
ii. then I defined child realm2 and realm3
now
iii. I want child realm2 to handle SIP requests towards sip port x.x.x.x and child realm3 to manage SIP requests towards sip port y.y.y.y
The aim therefore is to create local policy to split the request between the two child realms
eg realm1 x.x.x.x [local-policy] realm2 --- >core network - A
realm1 y.y.y.y [local-policy] realm3 --->core network - B
Hope this heps to better explain, if not I could paste snippnet of lab config
Thanks for reviewing.
Jason M
Re: SIP REFER and SIPREC
Hello,
You can check with configuring different realm for User B and User C. Then enabled session-recording-server on realm C from where SBC is going to generate INVITE towards User C after refer.
Regards,
Ronak
SIP REFER and SIPREC
this is on an ESBC 9.3
call comes in from our PSTN carrier and is sent via local policy to a system on a TLS/SRTP trunk. This call does not need to be (should not be) recorded.
Now, some of the calls are transferred back, via SIP REFER, and then go to a different system and this leg of the call needs to be recorded (SIPREC).
I can successfully route the call to its new destination (if it matters, I have refer-src-routing disabled) but I cannot get it to start the SIPREC. I'm thinking this is because the original call, before it came back via the REFER, never was recorded - ?
is there a way to enable SIPREC for the new leg of the call, after the SIP REFER?
thank you
SBC HA when using SIP/TCP
Assuming the standard deployment of a call server setting up calls between sip phones, the SBC separating the two:
- sip phones on one side of the SBC - access
- call server on the other side of the SBC - core.
SIP/UDP is used between the SBC and the call server.
As the sip phones are behind NAT, HNT is used.
When SIP/UDP is used between the phones and the SBC, in case of a SBC HA failover, the active calls are maintained and if one side disconnects the call, the call is properly disconnected on the remote side too.
However, if I use SIP/TCP between the sip phones and the SBC, in case of a SBC HA failover, the calls are maintained but if one side disconnects the call, the remote side is not disconnected.
Traces shows that the call server receives the BYE message from the disconnecting side and send a BYE message to the remote side - via the SBC. However, the SBC replays 503 service unavailable - looks like if it doesn't know how to forward the call to the remote side - as if he lost the TCP connection.
Is this the expected behaviour from the SBC HA when using SIP/TCP ?
If not, any idea how I can get calls using SIP/TCP to behave like the calls using SIP/UDP and get disconnected properly ?
Tnx,
Dan