Best Of
Re: Match Exception RULE_R600 triggered when there are no available receipts
@Wendy Jamison Thank you :)
@Gail-Oracle - the article you refer to is not the issue we are having. The article refers to running multiple vouchers through matching at the same time which we are already aware of. The issue we have provided is when multiple vouchers are associated to purchase orders over a period of time and matched separately.
1st voucher matches to the receipt
The 2nd is overridden and subsequently matched
The 3rd voucher and then ran through matching separately and flags and R600 instead of an R500
Re: The 2024 Paperwork Burden Reduction Act for ACA
Hi Sarah,
We are working on the delivery of the solution for the legilation with 37740940 - UPDATE ACA FORM 1095-C CONSENT PROCESS DUE TO PAPERWORK BURDEN REDUCTION ACT.
As for the reset process, we made a change for employers to decide if they want to reset employees for electronic or paper. You may need update your customization for the update.
Regards,
Anne
Re: surrogate-agent registration
Hello,
I found the issue, it was Contact header in 200 OK reply on REGISTER message. Provider is sending registrar address as a host part in Contact header instead of leaving my sip-interface address. So I applied HMR to correct host in Contact and viola.
Best regards
Dalibor
Re: ECC Analyzer is available 200.77 but downloading version is 200.50
Hi -
Thanks for using Oracle community !
Please confirm the product
regrds,
Ananth
Re: PeopleSoft HCM - Migration Of Questionnaires Using Data Mover
Hi,
Here is the ADS definition project (link below) which I have created and validated for moving data between instances via PIA.
I have tried to included the related definitions as a separate ADS definitions, so that it can be included optionally to your ADS project.
GitHub Link :
Note: Do try for dummy QF data before using it on the actual data.
Let me know if this works for you as well.
Thanks
Matheshwaran V
Re: PeopleSoft HCM - Migration Of Questionnaires Using Data Mover
Hi @Khalid Akhtar,
If this is only for specific questionnaire, check if the Question ID's matching from your EOQF_QQSTN_TBL table to EOQF_QUESTION table. Or similar relationships between your setup tables and questionnaire tables.
I'm planning to have an ADS created (which I found out not existed still) for moving this data. Once it is ready I'll try to share it here.
Thanks
Matheshwaran V
👍️ if you find this helpful and "Quote" in responding.
Re: HMR to Modify Call-ID Header
Hello,
If rule proposed by Antonio does not work, then SBC forces "trottelsicher" protection of From tag, To tag and Call-ID against manual modification.
Regards.
Daureen
Re: HMR to Modify Call-ID Header
Hello
u can easily apply this HMR :
I suggest u to apply as inbound with "out-of-dialog" msg-type , that's because SBC might need to restore the original value enabling the UAC to identify the message correctly as being part of thesame dialog .
For out-of-dialog requests (when the To, From, or Call-ID headers are modified) the original header is stored in the dialog when the msg-type out-of-dialog is used , by they way if in this "case out-of-dialog" is not used this may cause problems for requests leaving the SBC for the UAC because the dialog does not match the initial request sent.
Cheers
Antonio











