Hello User_XW280, Good day! I would just like to follow up for the additional information requested. Thank you! 😊

Hello AhmedM, Good day! If you found a comment helpful, please consider marking it as 'Yes' in the 'Did this answer the question?' section. Your feedback will help other users with similar concerns find the answer more easily. Thank you for your help. 😊

Hello Vernita, Good day! Apologies for the lack of update on this thread. Please be advised that I am still checking this concern. To other users, feel free to share your insights on this thread. Thank you! 😊

Hello Katherine, Good day! Apologies for the late revert. Per checking, the approval process can only be set if we work with payment batches. And yes, it is necessary to have an active Advanced Electronic Banking Payments license to set an approval process. I hope this helps. Thank you! 😊

Hello Maxeem-83, Good day! Per my understanding, you want to show details of deleted Sales Order Line Items on a Saved Search, am I correct? If so, this expected behavior is logged under Enhancement 347026 Transactions > Management > View Audit Trail showing Change action on transactions but not reflected in the…

Hello User_32GQL, Good day! 😊 Can you confirm how you pay your Bills? Normally, when an EFT payment is to be made, the process would be through Payments > Payment Processing > Bill Payment Processing, and there is no Check # field available. Per my testing, when paying through Transactions > Payables > Pay Bills/Pay Single…

Hello BM136, Just to confirm, you tried the solution provided on SuiteAnswers 89078 but it is not working on your end, am I correct? Can you share screenshots of the affected transaction? Kindly cover confidential information. Thank you! 😊

That's good news! 🎉 Thanks for the update, TThompson-CM. However, I can't provide a specific date when this fix will be released. Let's all keep an eye on for updates on this issue. Thank you for your patience. 😊

Thank you for sharing your insights on this, User_2LD8N! 😊 Hello Kedalene, you can also check what User_2LD8N mentioned. Here are some related SuiteAnswers articles for this as well: 9071 Using Auto-Generated Numbering for Transactions 9876 Using Subsidiary-Specific Transaction Auto-Numbering 94304 Update Initial Number…

Hello Kedalene, The setup of your Auto-Generated Numbers actually depends on your team. As such, I suggest discussing this on your end. But for reference, sharing with you some tests I did so you can visualize what will be the output of your setup. Here's the initial setup of my Auto-Generated Number: When I create an…

Thank you for creating this thread, @Wellyntong@dylanvv!😊 Hello, everyone! Feel free to join in this discussion and share your insights with us. Thank you.

Hello Oliver, Per checking, this expected behavior is still not possible. Same concerns or cases are attached to Enhancement 109537 Report Snapshots > Customer would like the Reports Snapshot show reports for a custom date range which you also mentioned. Apologies for the inconvenience that this is causing you. Hoping for…

Hello User_4GX2Z, I would just like to further clarify the expected behavior. On your email template, you want to display the Portugal Transaction ID (FT23/000002006) instead of the Invoice Number (INPT01000016), correct? Regarding the ability to global search the Portugal Transaction ID, this is currently an Enhancement…

Hello Ranjith, Per checking, the expected behavior is currently an Enhancement and logged as Enhancement 551252 Installment = T > CSV import Vendor payment for bills with installment payments term on > Ambiguity error on logical key multi-match. Even though the subject only mentioned Vendor Payment, this Enhancement also…

Thank you for creating this thread, @Wellyntong!😊 Hello, everyone! Feel free to join in this discussion and share your insights with us. Thank you.

Thank you for creating this thread, @Volkan Eroglu! 😊 Hello, everyone! Feel free to join in this discussion and share your insights with us. Thank you.

Hello @HoJo, can you share with User_M4JOC the solution you did for this concern? Hi User_M4JOC, were you able to try this report provided by Ivy? Are you working on a Report? Kindly share some screenshots to further explain your concern and for us to better visualize it. Please cover confidential information. Thank you!😊

Thank you for sharing your insights on this, Tigran! ❤️ Hello User_FSSYJ, kindly check what Tigran provided. I hope this will work on your end. Thank you! 😊

Hello Vernita, Apologies for the late revert. Upon further checking, there's an Enhancement filed regarding this concern. It's logged as Enhancement 85832 Item Fulfillment > Ability to Bill when Status = Picked or Packed. Unfortunately, there's no alternate solution provided for this issue. You have to enable the Invoice…

Hello everyone, As of this writing, our engineers are still working on a fix for this Defect. Thank you for your patience. 🙇‍♀️

Hello User_XW280, Good day! I sent you an email regarding this concern. Kindly check. Thank you! 😊

Thank you for the confirmation, Fabs! Can you also confirm what is the expected ship date on order 205? 

Hello AhmedM, Good day! Apologies for the late revert. I consulted this internally and I am informed that there's indeed a SuiteApp in the marketplace for Saudi Arabia e-Invoicing. This covers Phase 2 of the mandate so customers will be advised by ZATCA they need to implement e-Invoicing Phase 2. If a customer is still…

Thank you, FazeprooF! Feel free to create content or post a discussion under the NetSuite Admin Corner to share the resolution you'll come up with ACS. 😊

Hello Dan, Good day! If you found a comment helpful, please consider marking it as 'Yes' in the 'Did this answer the question?' section. Your feedback will help other users with similar concerns find the answer more easily. Thank you for your help. 😊

Hello emcee_uk, Good day! Do you need further assistance on this?

Hello Adrianna, Good day! Do you need further assistance on this? It would be appreciated if you can provide the additional information requested. Thank you! 😊

Hello tech work, Good day! Were you able to check this? Thank you! 😊

Hello Maleeka, Good day! Do you need further assistance on this? It would be appreciated if you can provide the additional information requested. Thank you! 😊

Hello Fabs, Good day! Apologies for the late revert. I consulted this internally and I am advised that the Allocation Type of the Order Allocation Strategy (Project Dome - Demo) might have influenced the reported behavior. Is the Allocation Type set to ‘Firm’ by any chance? If that's true, then since Order 203 is created…