Unfortunately, that would not be possible. I would suggest submit an enhancement request for such customization. -Mikko

Apologies for the confusion, @Vernita . You may use Saved Search as mentioned on the previous comment but this would be the source of a Custom Field that you can choose on the Insert Field option in the Email Template. The general idea would be: Create Saved Search to get the desired value from IF to Invoice. Create a…

Hi @Benjamin Paul - USA , Thank you for posting again in the community! Please allow some time for the gurus/members to look into your concern and get back with more information. To everyone, feel free to share your insights! -Mikko

Hi @User_J2TXN , Thank you for posting in the community! Our gurus/members will check on this and update you for any findings. To everyone, feel free to comment your ideas! -Mikko

Hi @User_J6WYT , Thank you for posting in the community! Our gurus/members will look into your concern and get back with more information. To everyone, feel free to share your thoughts! -Mikko

We would appreciate if you could update the thread regarding the findings on the ticket submitted. You can also mention this thread on the case and as well as the steps you have done so far. -Mikko

How's it going, @Benjamin Paul - USA ? -Mikko

Hi @Vernita , I would suggest using Transaction Saved Search Join fields to get the desired value from Item Fulfillment to Invoice Record. Making Sales Order the connection between the IF and Invoice Records. Would this be feasible on your end? -Mikko

Hi Greg @greg.hillPVG , the developers are correct and it is currently logged as Enhancement #168908 WS>Expose Profit and Loss Report Result in Web Services. You can vote to this enhancement by submitting a case to support team or visit SuiteIdeas. There is no alternate solution mentioned in the enhancement record.…

Hi Janet @J Goldstein , may we ask where you at at your customization? Are you receiving any errors? You may want to check the following articles that could help you understand the process: Ad Hoc Inspection Queues On-Demand Quality Inspection Queues Quality Management Triggers Quality Management Best Practices Quality…

Hi @Paul L. Walker , this should be possible via script/workflows. As mentioned by Joy, you may need a developer to properly discuss the customization required on your business process or you can coordinate with your Account Manager and discuss this with the Professional Services Team or Advanced Customer Support team.…

Hi @MA User_576EZ , if the customizations used in the SuiteApp is not locked then it is possible to customize the SuiteApp within NetSuite. Otherwise, you may need to coordinate with the owner of this SuiteApp. It is best to communicate with the creator of the SuiteApp to discuss on how you want to customize it. -Mikko

Kindly look on your email on how we can proceed on this concern. -Mikko

You can change it via script by changing the Employee Approval information. You must check what approval routing was used and check it from there. -Mikko

Hi @Vernita , Contact sublist is scriptable. Instead of getSublistField(which return the field object), use getSublistValue(to get the value of specific field). Please take note that 'contactroles' internalid is used for the Contacts under Access Subtab while 'contact' internalid is used for Contacts under Relationship…

Hi @User_UFOSV , unfortunately, there is no out of the box function to determine integration using HMAC-SHA1. Things you could do are: coordinate with your integrator or submit a case to support team and they could help check the backend if your integration is using HMAC-SHA1. -Mikko

Hi @User_YLQQA , Thank you for posting in the community! Our gurus/members will look into your concern and update for any findings. To everyone, feel free to share your ideas! -Mikko

Hi Janet @J Goldstein , Thank you for posting in the community! Please allow some time for the gurus/members to check on your concern and get back with more information. To everyone, feel free to share your thoughts! -Mikko

Hi @OliverK , The latest error pertains to the file module. Define 'N/file' and include file in your function parameter. -Mikko

Would you be able to submit a Support Ticket so the team can further check your account if this is a potential defect? Also, have you tried clearing cache of the browser you are using? -Mikko

Hi @Neo_Suite , as mentioned the Next approver is only available on view mode and cannot be edited on the record. You can then change the employee information for the approver details. See article for reference. -Mikko

It seems the field is created via Script thus you cannot see it on the Form. Could you clarify what kind of change you want with the field? E.g the value or the field itself? -Mikko

This is also related to the enhancement mentioned previously. However, you can create another request and be specific on the details. The difference on the requests are the parameters. Could you please try using SecureString on the message Id before sending the request? -Mikko

How's it going, @@User_B6T7M ? -Mikko

There is no detail specifically mentioned about Microsoft Surface but then again it could encounter the same issue if this is MS Surface is a newer device. -Mikko

Can you please try using Test status and also, try to undeploy the original deployment record and then deploy again the script. Try also using different browser. -Mikko

Hi Ubaid @User_JGEWC , Currently, there is no alternate solution mentioned on the enhancement record. To everyone who have similar scenario, feel free to share your insights! -Mikko

That should be enough. Can you also check if you can add "Find Transaction" in the Transaction Subtab on the permissions. If yes, kindly set it to Full as well. -Mikko

Would changing the createFilter syntax on your code to filter expressions like on this article be feasible on your end? After changing the syntaxes, you can then include the syntax mentioned on the previous comments. -Mikko

The isDisabled is not read-only and can work on the columns object. However, as the name said, it will only disable the field but not hide it. -Mikko