Red Velasco-Oracle Gold Trophy

Hello @User_CB63L, Good day! I've created a separate thread in your behalf so it can be properly documented. To check if the custbody_fam_process_id (or a similar field) is available in your system: Open a sample Journal Entry created by the FAM process (like Depreciation). Click Customize > Customize Form (or Edit the…

Hello @User_WSIPL, Thank you for bringing up such an interesting question! 🌟 This is what the NetSuite Community is all about—supporting each other. Let's hear your thoughts, everyone!

Hi @User_8EO0Q , Greetings! Thanks for posting your questions here, let’s open it up to our experts and wait their response. Our community will be sure to aid.

Hello @User_Q1DPO, In NetSuite Saved Searches, the Transaction Number field (tranid) does not support multi-select by default in the standard filter UI. However, you can work around this using the "Formula (Text)" field and IN logic. Here’s how: Steps to Filter Multiple Transaction Numbers: Go to Reports > Saved Searches >…

Hello @User_KCDN4, Thank you for jumping in with this great question! 🚀 The NetSuite Community thrives on collaboration—let's all come together to provide some valuable insights. Community, your expertise is always welcome!

Hello @User_ZD341, Just touching base on this. Let me know if you require further support! 🙏

Hello @esabis, Unfortunately, there is no current configuration option in NetSuite to change the standard form used for Journal Entries created by the Post Time process. System-generated Journal Entries — including those from time posting — will always use the standard journal entry form, regardless of the preferred form…

Hello @Meherin, It looks like your workflow is successfully populating the Customer Message field when a specific item is selected, but it's overriding or locking the field—preventing manual edits afterward. This typically happens if: The workflow action is set to trigger continuously (e.g., on Field Changed or Before…

Hello @User_ZD341, Yes, you're not alone—this change in behavior is a known effect of recent Fixed Assets Management (FAM) bundle updates. Previously, system-generated Journal Entries (like Depreciation) showed created_by = -4 (System), which made it easy to auto-approve them through workflows. But now, FAM entries reflect…

Hi @esabis, Thank you for jumping in with this great question! 🚀 The NetSuite Community thrives on collaboration—let's all come together to provide some valuable insights. Community, your expertise is always welcome!

Hello @Meherin, Does it show something else when you check Show Rejected Actions on the Workflow Log?

Hi @Meherin, Good day to you! Would you mind sharing the workflow logs to see what happens when the workflow executes? Take a screenshot as well. Thanks!

Hello @Vismay Barot, Just touching base on this. Let me know if you require further support! 🙏

Hello @Vismay Barot, Workflows in NetSuite have limited access to sublist data like the Vendor sublist on an item record. Unfortunately, you cannot directly reference sublist values (e.g., vendor codes from the Vendors sublist) in Workflow actions or conditions. A common workaround is to use a User Event Script or…

Greetings @Dale Glen, If certain fields aren't showing on your Advanced PDF/HTML form—despite the script being the same across item types—the issue may not be the item type (kit, inventory, or assembly) itself but rather data availability or field referencing in the template. Even if the script block is consistent, fields…

Hello @User_KY495, Thanks for reaching out! 💬 This is the perfect place to get answers, and the NetSuite Community is always ready to help. Let’s open up the discussion and share some insights!

Hello @esabis Thanks for reaching out! 💬 This is the perfect place to get answers, and the NetSuite Community is always ready to help. Let’s open up the discussion and share some insights!

Hi @User283824, Yes, this behavior is expected due to how NetSuite workflows and customer records handle subsidiaries. Even if a customer has open invoices in Subsidiary B, the workflow may still default to using the customer’s primary subsidiary (Subsidiary A) when sending the Statement of Account. Removing the subsidiary…

Hello @Andy Galuski, Just touching base on this. Let me know if you require further support! 🙏

Hello @FazeprooF, Thanks for reaching out! 💬 This is the perfect place to get answers, and the NetSuite Community is always ready to help. Let’s open up the discussion and share some insights!

Hello @User_ZM6F1, You're on the right track—NetSuite doesn’t provide a built-in API or view to retrieve Trial Balance or "as of" account balances directly, so using SuiteAnalytics Connect (ODBC or SuiteQL) with the TransactionAccountingLine, Transaction, and Account tables is the standard approach. Filtering by posting =…

Hello @User_MDE0V, Currently there are no recent updates on enhancement #177768, but rest assured that enhancement are regularly reviewed to be applied to the next netsuite update. Apologies for the inconvenience.

Hello @Andy Galuski, Yes it's listed as enhancement number #216984 > Inline Editing = F and Show Inactives = T; Ability for the system to not reflect another deactivation activity for an already Inactive item.

Hello @User283824, Just touching base on this. Let me know if you require further support! 🙏

Hello @Andy Galuski, Yes, what you're describing is a known behavior (and limitation) within NetSuite, especially when using inline editing or bulk edits from list views like "Show Inactives." These types of edits often bypass User Event scripts, workflows, and some real-time triggers, because they don’t trigger the same…

Hi @User283824, It sounds like you're trying to send Statements of Account automatically via workflow, targeting customers associated with Subsidiary B—even if Subsidiary B is not their primary subsidiary. The issue you're running into stems from how NetSuite workflows and saved searches evaluate subsidiary relationships:…

Hello @Wuebben Design.com, Circling back to check if this concern is resolved. Let me know if I can help further! 👋

Hello @rgonz-mhi, Circling back to check if this concern is resolved. Let me know if I can help further!

Hello @FM____hx, You can use this simple SuiteAnswers Article "Source Code Editing to Customize Advanced Templates ID: 48809". Please let me know if it works.

Hello @Connor Fiederlein, You can create a simple workflow that would source the PO #.