Get Started with Redwood for Oracle Cloud HCM Begin Now
To ensure that questions get required attention from community members and are NOT left unanswered, it’s important for the author to indicate (by selecting “Yes” or “No” when prompted) whether the question was answered. (newly added) Please note that it is also important to respond to EACH comment your question receives. Your Yes or No response ensures an accurate status for your question.
For more information, please refer to this announcement explaining best practices for getting answers to questions.
For more information, please refer to this announcement explaining best practices for getting answers to questions.
OTL dependency On Absence and Payroll
Summary:
Any risk in Implementing Absence and Payroll without OTL in 1st phase and later Implementing OTL in phase2
Content (required):
We are Implementing HCM for one of our client and going with staggered approach. We have planned Absence and Payroll in Phase 1 and OTL in Phase2. Let us know if this is right approach. Are there are any tight dependencies?
Are there any businesses cases where we will stuck in future while Implementing OTL later?
Any point that we need to consider? Any risks?
Version (include the version you are using, if applicable):
21C
Code Snippet (add any code snippets that support your topic, if applicable):
0