Best Of
Why is NN skipping the correct invoice number as per set NN set up India Localization R42565 ?
We’ve set up NN (setup 0223) to print a specific invoice number (25180223) from R42565, but the system is skipping it and assigning the next number (25180224) instead.
The client is using JD Edwards 9.1 with India Localization.
Here’s what we’ve observed:
- The F75I807 table is generating a repeat record for invoice number 25180224, and assigning it to SO 25180181, which already has that invoice.
- The correct invoice number 25180223 should be linked to SO 25180176, but it’s not getting picked up during the R42565 run.
Summary:
- NN Setup: 0223
- Data Selection (SO): 25180176
- Expected Invoice Number: 25180223 (RI)
Re: AP/AR Netting Across Operating Units (Under Same Legal Entity).
Hi
EBS AR and AP module does not support activities across Operating units including AP/AR netting and there is no near plan to fix the same.
Best Regards,
Bharat
Re: AP/AR Netting Across Operating Units (Under Same Legal Entity).
Hi there,
As of now I don't see any enhancments got developed to address the ask of AP/AR netting across operating units is not supported in Oracle EBS R12.
This may help:
R12: AP: AP/AR Netting FAQs (Doc ID 602005.1)
Thanks,
Neeraj
Re: Query to list GRN Received but not transected as of Date
Look for the table rcv_supply. It holds transactions received but not yet delivered.
Below are some report related to Receiving. It might help you in future.
Receipt Adjustments Report (PO) - Use this report to review all or specific purchase order shipments with returns or corrections.
Receipt Traveler (PO) - Use this report to print delivery tickets that you use to facilitate delivery of goods you received within your organization.
Receipt/Inspection/ Delivery Register (PO) - Use this report to review detail information about your receiving transactions.
Receiving Exceptions Report (PO) - Use this report to review all or specific purchase order shipments you placed on exception hold.
Note : Please mark reply as Correct/Helpful if it helps you.That will help other customers to locate correct answers
Thanks Yogesh
Control Decimal Precision on the Receipt Traveler XML Report
Learn how to configure decimal precision for quantity fields on XML reports such as the Receipt Traveler Report. Receipt Traveler Report can display up to 6 decimals (max). This can be adjusted as needed to display fewer decimals if needed. Doc ID 3086129.1.
#EBS #Logistics
Re: How can i block multiple 180 ringing at Oracle SBC
Hi,
This warning is just a warning, and can be disregarded. The merge-early-dialogs by itself does not require transcoding resources.
Regards,
Chris
Re: Physical standby database instance licensing
Hello F1R7Z,
DataGuard is part of "EE" so no need for extra licensing for the "option", but the server hosting the STANDBY (or occasionally the PRIMARY) has to be licensed…
What's more: beware of not using "Active DataGuard" (as it is very easy to do it without realizing) as this is an extra option that requires extra licensing (and is not cheap…)
Something else: welcome to MOSC community (well, you arrived ~6 months ago but it isn't too late to welcome you); note that you can very easily change your "display name" into a more "human-friendly" value, just have a look at and you can also have a look at the follwowing document containing several pointers to other documents:
Best regards,
Bruno Vroman.
(Edited: about RAC, note also the possibility of using "RAC One Node", cheaper than full RAC)
Re: Physical standby database instance licensing
As licensing is a complicated thing, we can just repeat standard licensing rules.
A standby environment must follow the same rule (licensing NUP or CPU) like the primary and in most cases, you do need the same Enterprise Edition Packs on top (e.g. Partitioning, Tuning,Diagnostics,…). You don't need to license RAC option if the standby is on a Single System. Nevertheless - ask your Oracle Sales to approve this.
What is the best way to configure BU level security for an expenses Insights Dashboard?
Hello,
I am in the process of developing a custom Insights Dashboard for the expenses module for my agency. I am trying to work through security testing now. I am trying to determine the best way to assign BU level security for the results in the dashboards. Currently, we have the search definition we are using for the dashboard configured to source-level security, with the query security record SP_BUEX_VW assigned to the ex_sheet_hdr record on the BU. (ex_sheet_hdr is a primary record for the query associated with the search definition we are using) My team thinks that this will work in theory, however, me being newer to security, am unsure. The only reason that I am unsure is because, to the best of my understanding, the query is not executed for each different user every time they access the dashboard. This makes me think that a query security record may not be the best option. My understanding of search framework security is that source-level security within the search framework grants users with the appropriate role assignments complete access to all results derived from a specific search definition; it's an all-or-nothing approach that doesn't filter results further. Am I correct on this or am I misunderstanding? If my understanding is on the right path, then I don't believe source-level security will work for us, but maybe I'm wrong?
I explored how the PS delivered expense search definitions were configured from a security standpoint to compare and give myself a better understanding, and they all appeared to have the same structure. The PS delivered security query EX_SRCH_SECURITY_SES_KIB appears to focus on sheet_id and the oprid of the approver of the sheet_id. Essentially, this security query just finds the sheet id and a corresponding approver that can approve the sheet_id, and if you order the query by the oprid of the approver, you can see a list of all sheet_ids that any one oprid can approve. With this understanding.. I don't know if this solution is what my team needs either. We want executives to be able to view high-level TE data for BUs that they have access too.
We need BU level security, not approver oprid security.. if that makes sense. I created a query in a lower environment, let's call it, te_bu_sec_query that selects the oprid, bu, and descr from the SP_BUEX_OPRVW record and joined on the psoprdefn record to get the oprid's emplid and name. Then I went to the connected query and mapped on this te_bu_sec_query on the BU field. Would this approach better solve my needs? I was thinking that this was the approach my business needs, however, am not 100% certain. Like I stated above, the goal of this dashboard is to allow executives access to high-level TE data/insights for BUs that they have access to, and nothing more. We tried the approach in paragraph 1, but am not 100% that will work. Could anyone provide any other guidance or expertise to help me determine best next steps? Like I said, I'm a little new to peoplesoft security so I want to be cognizant of best practices.
Our Releases:
PT: 8.60.13
OpenSearch v 2.3.





