Best Of
Re: PeopleSoft HCM - Migration Of Questionnaires Using Data Mover
Hi @Khalid Akhtar,
If this is only for specific questionnaire, check if the Question ID's matching from your EOQF_QQSTN_TBL table to EOQF_QUESTION table. Or similar relationships between your setup tables and questionnaire tables.
I'm planning to have an ADS created (which I found out not existed still) for moving this data. Once it is ready I'll try to share it here.
Thanks
Matheshwaran V
👍️ if you find this helpful and "Quote" in responding.
Re: HMR to Modify Call-ID Header
Hello,
If rule proposed by Antonio does not work, then SBC forces "trottelsicher" protection of From tag, To tag and Call-ID against manual modification.
Regards.
Daureen
Re: HMR to Modify Call-ID Header
Hello
u can easily apply this HMR :
I suggest u to apply as inbound with "out-of-dialog" msg-type , that's because SBC might need to restore the original value enabling the UAC to identify the message correctly as being part of thesame dialog .
For out-of-dialog requests (when the To, From, or Call-ID headers are modified) the original header is stored in the dialog when the msg-type out-of-dialog is used , by they way if in this "case out-of-dialog" is not used this may cause problems for requests leaving the SBC for the UAC because the dialog does not match the initial request sent.
Cheers
Antonio
Unable to resolve issue Deployer:149166, even after deleting domain edit.lok file
Hi Everyone,
I am trying to activate Oracle 12c ServiceBus after deploying our project. I am getting below error after 17 mins. one of the suggested solution is to delete edit.lok file (http://www.errbay.com/?r=ORCL-WBLG-12.1.3&c=BEA-149166), which is not working for me. Can someone please help me?
[java] Caused by: java.lang.Exception: Deployment Failed: weblogic.management.ManagementException: [Deployer:149166]Deployments cannot be triggered through configuration updates and through the Deployment APIs simultaneously.
Thanks in Advacne
Re: Custom Integrator | Returning id and description to attributes
Hi,
The LOV SQL should return both the supplier name and the customer number (or supplier number).
Create Two Columns in Your Integrator:
For example:
Attribute1: Supplier/Vendor Name (with Table LOV attached)
Attribute2: Supplier Number or ID (to capture supplier_number or vendor_id)
Define the Table LOV With Return Attributes:
In WebADI's “Define Table LOV” form (or when defining via the integrator interface), you can assign Return Attributes. This mapping determines which LOV column populates which attribute in your integrator.
Specify:
Display Column: Maps to Supplier/Vendor Name (populates Attribute1)
Return Column(s): Map Supplier Number/ID to Attribute2
For example:
Table column 1: SUPPLIER_NAME ➔ Binds to Attribute1 (displayed)
Table column 2: SUPPLIER_NUMBER or SUPPLIER_ID ➔ Binds to Attribute2 (not shown but auto-filled on selection)
Setting Up the Return Mapping:
In the “Define Table LOV” UI, there should be a Return Attributes section.
For the column you want to return (e.g., supplier number), enter the target attribute (e.g., Attribute2) in the “Attribute Name” field.
Validate and Test:
When using the integrator, selecting a value from the LOV should populate Attribute1 with the vendor name and Attribute2 with the vendor number or ID.
Make sure both attributes are defined as columns in your integrator definition.
You must set up the Return Attribute mapping for your LOV in the custom integrator definition; this is not a default behavior, but a specific setup step.
Regards,
Monika
Re: What happened to My Oracle Support?
"Additionally, I just checked the previous favorites and I have nothing…so it isn't fixed it is still broke."
In their eyes it is; to paraphrase a SR reply posted on Reddit; only .1 docs migrated. So all my advisory favs - are NOT! If all your fav docs were not .1 docs then nada…
Re: What happened to My Oracle Support?
None of the above will make a difference when the user community is struggling to find things that were readily available. Most of us do not have the time to "catch up" on how to use new support portal. Like any other IT company in the cloud (you aren't the only ones!), they are using multiple layers of autentication. Why not do that first, instead of this insane overhaul that is hurting our productivity???
Re: My Oracle Support, are you really happy with what you've delivered ?
Yes agreed, Oracle is kicking their customers out of the door and send them to SAP!
Re: My Oracle Support, are you really happy with what you've delivered ?
Let me join the list of customers that are really unhappy with this new and cough improved cough support portal. It's awful. Simply awful!!!! No way to sugar-coat it, it's awful.
Where is the Certifications tab? I can't for the life of me seem to find anything that had that functionality in the new site.
Where are my old favorites? Oh..I see that Oracle Support was kind to put them in profile—>Preferences—>Previous Favorites. However, I had lots of faves bookmarked so I did what people naturally do, I categorized them by storing the favorites in different folders. None of my favorites that were in folders are in my list of Previous Favorites. Apparently this is a known issue.
The primary goal of these changes is to enhance the safety and security of My Oracle Support (MOS), which is especially important as we continue to operate in the cloud.
While that may have been your big reason to change, our big reason for using MOS was to get support! Its great that you think this is a more secure platform. But its very unusable in its current form.
Where are the Announcements?
Where is the, what used to be, ever present link to the latest/greatest CPU?
Now that the MOS Notes have been migrated to KB articles and the old links don't work any more, I'd like to start generating a new list of favorites, but I cant seem to do that any more.
These updates are significant, and adapting to them can be challenging for everyone—including Support Engineers.
Agree…no one likes change. But this isn't change. This is a very user UNFRIENDLY system. Please revert it back to what it was before.
Cheers,
Brian
Re: My Oracle Support, are you really happy with what you've delivered ?
I suggest we should get as many customers as possible to force Oracle change back to the old MOS version. We pay lots of money for licenses and maintenances to Oracle and we deserve to have better service, not this piece of drunk!