We have not applied Activity Code to the project task level as this does not appear to be required for this functionality to work correctly.

All the transactions showing as Other will not Match on the WBS. This leads us back to the original question.

Thanks for the clarification the Unmatched is related to the Advanced Project Profitability configuration. So this points me to a longstanding issue we have faced. How do we handle setting up the Rows in the Advanced Project Profitability when there is no Item or Expense Category? See attached picture.

What is showing as Unmatched is Actual Cost based on employee hourly pay. I agree this should match based upon Project Task and Activity code. The Project Task is set on the time sheet. We are not using Activity Code. I am confused why you have questions regarding the project profitability setup as I did not think it…

That was it. The item was incorrectly initially created as Service, although it is not Service. Thanks.

Also as you asked, you can see a comment at the beginning of this thread indicating the Financial Data has been recalculated.

We are using "inoLECT Configuration" as our default for P&L. Are is a screenshot of the configuration has been attached. The item types on the invoices are "Power Quality : Power Quality: Equipment Only: Fixed Fee". Why would they show up in the Labor Income as the configuration does not include them there?

OK. We are on the same page with what should be showing. The Project P&L tab should reflect the results form the Standard Configuration Project Profitability. If you look at the screen shots above, you can see that this is not the case. For some reason the Project P&L Tab is showing the $32,464.58 Revenue in both the Labor…

So if the P&L tab is to match the Project Profitability Report, why does it not? The screen shots above show both with different results.

It appears your comment is correct. The user had manually changed the auto calculated amount. When set back to 0, it seems to function as expected.

Screenshots attached.

We have tried this already. We are experiencing the same results across multiple users and multiple computers.

Pay special attention to 13 and 13.x. Notice the only EAC Cost being totaled is the 13.6 and 13.15 lines which also seem to be the only lines with Actuals. The WBS was built in NS manually.