I tried using Default For Location to a bunch of locations with no success.

Oops, I was on the wrong data set when I thought that had solved it. It appears to have had some effect, but there must be a couple more to find. One step closer at least~ I'll keep searching, though I've got a week off and will have a crack at it again once I'm back.

Thank you for the suggestion Patrick. I'm going away for a week and haven't yet had time to test your solution, but I'll be sure to update you once I do.

Not sure how it didn't cross my mind to consider this, haha. Thank you~

The issue has been ruled a defect and is under investigation. It had actually been done quite some time ago due to a similar case I raised that's essentially the same problem but didn't realize, whoops.

Mm, recreating it works. I've no idea what could be causing the original to not show up. But I'll go ahead, try to delete the hidden ones or make them inactive and recreate the rest of them now. Should have really tested that first, silly me. Thank you for your help~

Sure thing, I'd be happy with the additional help. Case # 5569833 Thank you~

Sorry, been away. Yes, all the subsidiaries that this effects are active.

Sorry, been away. I'm looking for Vat Liability SL, LR, NG... not VAT Sales. The first picture demonstrates a journal where I can see only the VAT on Sales and Purchases accounts, but I'm looking for VAT Liability. The second image shows the different Tax accounts I have and that they are mapped to the correct countries.

Thanks Patrick, onto the next step of the problem :D After saving items with cross-sub unchecked and target sub removed from line items I get: I can't seem to find the eliminate checkbox. MPUK is the subsidiary itself, in this example MPUK is the vendor. I have a similar PO where the field is filled with MPCN when MPCN is…

Yet another issue with OneWorld. After deleting the data inside of the intercompany accounts, I was then able to save the item with the correct COGS account and not run into the same error. After saving, I was then able to set the intercompany accounts back to their original values.

Unfortunately this has come up again, I'll be in contact with support to try and resolve the issue.

Yes, so on my initial transfer orders I needed to set the dates in order for them to be taken into consideration by the planning workbench. Then in the planning rule group is where I added the items that I want to be selected for transfer orders when the fulfilment needs to happen between particular locations. Added the…

Since the end result I want is for Purchase Price to be Last Purchase Price, perhaps I can make a workflow that triggers whenever a PO is received from a supplier to update the field.

Hey @Niks Blando-Oracle , do you know if it's possible to get it to use Transfer Orders? Noticing that with the above method PO and WO are the only two available options to chose from.

Okie doke. I'll reach out to support as well and maybe than can provide some more insight into why this might be happening. But it's good to see that there is perhaps an issue on my end. Thank you~ Regarding sales description, we have the display name, purchase description and sales description which are all standard…

Ah, it bulks them together once I go into the Order Items section in Transactions Supply Planning Order Items. So frustrating that all the tutorial videos on the workbench will release the orders and then just stop at that. Is Order Items the correct process other people use? I suppose I need to keep an eye on mass release…

Ah, I found it. Under locations, swap the view to planning, edit the location, then under the planning subtab of the location. Thanks for the guidance~

No, sorry, it doesn't appear to be in any of my forms including the default, yet all of them have it set to show and normal. But if you're suggesting it's part of the locations sublist then I'll start looking at why it's not in there rather than not in the inventory management tab. Thanks for the steer~

Mm, that's odd. It doesn't show up for me the same way. On mine, Ship Via is only a field within Shipment record. I can't find it in the transaction line and can't find Ship Name at all. Still can't find sales description either.

Sorry, having another ones now if you don't mind helping. Can't find ship method nor sales description

Mm, I don't seem to have the field available. Any idea why that might be? In the form customization it says it's turned on but I can't see anything.

Oh, I've just solved it, it wasn't the width at all, I had forgotten to center the tr. By changing the tr to a th I noticed that the width was filled correctly, just that the th was not. By adding align="center" to the th/tr that has fixed the issue. Sorry for the misdirection on the issue. Also useful to know that I don't…

Sorry for the delay, no that hasn't changed it all unfortunately. Tried applying it to all of and each of table, tr, td & p all to no change. What's further strange is that in the wysywig mode it displays correctly, but then not in the preview.

Sorry, been a bit swamped lately and missed this. I'll have a read and update with any findings/progress. Thank you for the steer.

Oh it's a global setting. Then to make it hidden on the form I untick show on the customization. Don't know why I didn't think to at least try that. Thanks!

THanks Michelle, worked exactly as expected~

Thanks Joy, it does give a decent use case. From what I understand, it's purpose is to provide clarification on the stock levels of different types of items and allow customers to order them through the webstore, is that right? Like, if I made red bikes and blue bikes and different BoMs, in my inventory I would just have…

Thank you for the assistance Jervin. Your prompting encourages me to keep testing and poking at it, I'd just get stuck in a slump otherwise.

Got it. ?number is in the correct place now and ?exists was not a valid check for if the field was empty.