3936434 Newbie

Hooray! I think I've pinned down the bug. It was, of course, my fault. =) In each of my calls to the client I do this check: if ( !Login() ) { return false; } and Login() looks something like this: if ( !bNsIsAuthenticated ) { /* get conn info */ lock ( requestLock ) { Status status = nsSvc.login(passport).status;…

Hmm ... there isn't any way to access Saved Searches via the Web Services API, is there? Maybe exposing a public search of the Items would work. If not, looks like I'll roll my own solution. Thanks anyway.

No, it's just me developing on one box. jchernia's solution seems to be working for now. Thank you.

Seems to be working ... I'll let you know if anything blows up.

I'll post the support number when I receive it ... I assume it'll get e-mailed to me? Here's the SOAP request: <soap:Envelope> <soap:Body> <get> <baseRef xsi:type="q1:CustomRecordRef" internalId="7" typeId="5"/> </get> </soap:Body> </soap:Envelope> And the SOAP response: ... snip…

I'm getting this behavior too. It's kind of creepy, because the same code sometimes works and sometimes gets UNEXPECTED_ERROR, more often failing than working. In addition, sometimes I'm not even getting a SOAP response back. Instead, I'm getting this: Client found response content type of 'text/html; charset=utf-8', but…

get() on custom records is still broken ... I'm getting USER_ERROR "the specified record does not exist" when I know for a fact that it exists because I just got all of the records via a search() to populate a dropdown box ... same goes for update(). It returns true without error messages but the custom field is…

Thanks a bunch! The confusing aspect was that organizer was being set to the logged in user implicitly. I guess that's what people want most of the time. But unless I missed it, it might be helpful to add a little note to the Record Guide in the future.

It only returns events created by the currently logged in user. I need events created by any user.

Our client has images in the "Customers" record type that they'd like to have accessible via WS. I'll second the motion for adding this capability to the WS API.