christianedensorarbon Red Ribbon

Hi @rui.silva, If you are want to using search and getAll operation using Web Services for the roles, unfortunately, Role is not available both as a RecordRec and as a search for web services. Only Contact Roles and Sales Roles are available on get and search operations. You may file a support ticket so we can have an…

Also, for each CustomRecordSearchRowBasic, it should contain the values of the custrecord100 field

For this one, have you first tried performing a test connect? using the -t parameter? Also, what I suggest is for you to get the same datacenter URL as your account. Let's say you logged in to NetSuite and you got directed to system.na1.netsuite.com, make sure that your host.url is set to…

HI @sbkp, For this one, I would suggest the use of script to have the CC field copied from the sales order to the customer record. Since you are using SuiteTalk, you can have a user event script deployed on your sales order on before submit and copy the cc info to to customer record by performing a load record of the…

schoeniger For this concern, have you enabled the Primary Authentication checkbox on the SAML setup page. By checking on the mentioned checkbox, it would allow Deep Linking or an SP-Initiated SAML process

Hi chrisatsc, More or less, urlencode is one of the most common pitfalls that we encounter from users reporting failure in TBA for WS. There's always this SuiteAnswers article to checkout for that one https://netsuite.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/44241/

Hi Scott, One, yes you have to add the items individually then in the end of the item list, you add the item group. similar to how it behaves in the user interface

Hi @iecpradeep, Supporting @tect22's proposal on queuing system, there are already quite a number of libraries that you could try if you are creating an inhouse application to integrate with NetSuite. In this days, you may use RabbitMQ and ZeroMQ to perform the process and request queuing in your inhouse application

There should be an object called CustomRecordSearchBasic for you to try

Hi Jacob, It does not require SuiteCloud Plus. Note that the default thread count for the data loader is 1 thread. I was able to create a customer record based from the example which is NSLoader -m c Customer doc\my_examples\sample_customer.csv One thing to test is that are you able to have a successful test connect? Also,…

Hi @ssilveri77, Would it be possible for your end to add the internal id corresponding to the List/Record field value that you are setting. I think that should help on this case.

Hi Justin, The scenario would either be similar to Divid's statement of the web services only checkbox or the computation of the signature is not the same as the one in SuiteAnswers ID 44241 https://netsuite.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/44241/

Hi Justin, For the PHP code, I suggest you checkout the sample posted in the SuiteTalk sample application. On the PHP Toolkit download, it contains a sample token generation class which you could supply on your call. Based on the source code, the generation of signature is fine based on the algorithm/requirements…

Hi @adhokane, For that problem, have you checked your the PHP configuration file for your server. Make sure that the php_soap and the php_openssl is not commented. Also what is the setting that you have on you default_socket_timeout. I would suggest that you set it up with a larger number to allow the parser more time…

Hi @adurangalvis, Here's a quick tip to deal with this concern, you may refer to the Microsoft .NET sample application for CRM in SuiteTalk Developer Resources @ .http://www.netsuite.com/portal/developers/resources/suitetalk-sample-applications.shtml You may check out the uploadFile() function in NSClientCRM.cs from the…

Agreeing with R3T1CAL , NetSuite does offer TAPI integration that would help you with this concern. if you are familiar of the usage on global search, this should work similarly as placing cus: <the customer name here>

It is still not supported and the best way is still using getCustomizationId

More or less, the approach to go over this concern is rather better done in Scheduled Script than performing it on the search level.

For the YES on the dialog, there's an expect package which you could utilize: http://www.admin-magazine.com/Articles/Automating-with-Expect-Scripts

sklett Have you already upgraded your IDE to version 17.1? If yes and this problem still occurs, please let us know through a support case so we could properly track you concern.

Hi CREECE What's the version of the account that you are working with? Are you using a 2016.2 account for this one

HI sklett , Have you tried clearing the store metadata on the your workspace's plugin metadata directory?

elie Have you tried upgrading the IDE already? From the testing that I have done on my end, the scenario is already not reproducible so more or less it should be already fine.

Hi @PL.John.Rosa, I encountered this before on Mars. Have you tried clearing the store metadata on the your workspace's plugin metadata directory? That worked on my end. Sometimes newer versions of Eclipse does not work nicely with plugins but I also tried testing Neon on my end and it responded as expected.

Hi @elie, Please let us know about this concern through a support case so we can track it on our end.

You would more or less write some RESTlet that G-Commerce should call if they support RESTful integration or G-Commerce should have a SOAP interface to connect to NetSuite's SuiteTalk Web Services to perform the mapping.

@SgtGrarm, More or less, you can try creating a Suitelet for this scenario which should be able to dynamically populate values based on the client that you have sent an email. This is achievable since Suitelets have the capability to track things through the parameters that is has on the url which you can also dynamically…

PowerBI support ODBC connections since then so if you plan to do something relating to PowerBI then you can try using SuiteAnalytics Connect feature.

Hi David, From an integration point of view, the Accept header should be the one to be used and I do agree with that one since it is definitely the choice of the integrating end more or less to check what would be accepted also as a part of security. Somehow, one the docs, it was mentioned that it is the current…

Hi Daniel, If you have configured you Box.com instance to have been configured give access and you have the Box portlet deployed on the customer center as well, then this should work fine.