Discussions
Join us for complimentary one-day events around the world and step into a future fueled by AI and limitless potential. Explore new breakthroughs, sharpen your skills, and connect with experts who are shaping what’s next. Experience bold keynotes, interactive learning, and connections that span the global NetSuite community. Discover what's next at SuiteConnect Tour 2026.
Intelligent Payment Automation, powered by BILL (aka Bill.com), lets you automate payments, manage vendor details, and bank account information within NetSuite.
The SuiteApp is available to organizations based in the U.S. with a valid U.S. address, or to global customers (except Canada, China, and Japan) with U.S. business subsidiaries. It only supports payments to vendors operating in the United States.
For more information, visit this thread.
Seeing eye-to-eye with your manager on your performance
The annual performance review is a standard process right now. At the majority of companies, employees will do their self-review and then the manager will take a look (or maybe they won't) and fill in a review of you as well.
I would like to challenge this, and ask: Why is this the case?
We've heard many different responses, such as that by having the employee fill in a review first, their manager can get a sense of where they think they are. Moreover, the self-review gives the employee a voice on how they think they performance, and this voice will be taken into consideration against the manager's review when determining compensation changes. There are a number of other reasons that we've heard as well; however, in the end, all of the different responses have suggested that the employee and their manager need two separate forms because they will have different things to say. Because the employee and their manager do not see eye-to-eye.