Discussions
Stay up-to-date with the latest news from NetSuite. You’ll be in the know about how to connect with peers and take your business to new heights at our virtual, in-person, on demand events, and much more.
Now is the time to ask your NetSuite-savvy friends and colleagues to join the NetSuite Support Community! Refer now! Click here to watch and learn more!
Update your Profile with your Support type to get your Support Type badge.
Uncover the power of data with the Analytics Hub —your ultimate guide to mastering NetSuite Saved Searches and Reports. Simplify the complex and unlock your organization's true potential. Dive into the Analytics Hub now and soar to new heights!
NetSuite 2025.2 Release Notes - This document summarizes the changes to NetSuite between 2025.2 and the previous release.
To help you get the most out of your 2025.2 Release Preview account, review the topics outlined in the 2025.2 Release Preview Guide.
SuiteWorld October 6 - 9, 2025: Agenda Builder is live!
Read on for the latest updates including:
• Agenda Builder launch
• SuiteWorld On Air registration
• New NetSuite Prompt Studio Contest
• And more!
Check out this thread to learn more!
Read on for the latest updates including:
• Agenda Builder launch
• SuiteWorld On Air registration
• New NetSuite Prompt Studio Contest
• And more!
Check out this thread to learn more!
Using HasKeywords Search Operator acts like StartsWith in SuiteScript
Anyone had any success using the HasKeywords operator when building searches via nlapiCreateSearch? I've found very little documentation on this operator, but in testing it appears that it is doing a StartWith when used with text fields.
What I'd like to do is this (searching item records):
new nlobjSearchFilter('description', null, 'haskeywords', 'HP Drive 8 GB')
It would be great if the behavior was: find any item where description has "HP" and has "Drive" and has "8" and has "GB".
I would expect that haskeywords would match entire "words" and not partial words (unlike a contains) which is documented in this thread:
0