3942203 Newbie

At what time do you combine the pendant with the chain? If it's right as it is leaving the door then it sounds like you could get away with kits (from a first read of your scenario) because you don't want to commit inventory when an order is entered. If you prebuild pendant+chain widgets then you will want to use…

Sounds like a good workflow just by looking at it. To be cliche, of course the devil is in the details. Let us know of any roadblocks you may come across. One problem that I can see for now is that it still will change the status of the customer to CLOSED-WON, but I don't see any way around that if you want to use the…

Good to hear! Are you up and running now?

Steve, I don't know of a way to do this within the UI. In v11.0.6, I tried to force the document status of a processed estimate by typing the following into the address bar when editing said estimate: javascript:nlapiSetFieldValue("status", "Open"); This appeared to work on the client side copy of the record, but did not…

True, I just didn't see that mentioned explicitly. I know this isn't your formal implementation documentation but it's good to make sure those things don't get missed. What a pain this all is :rolleyes:

Oh yeah, one other thing. We've done this with two opportunities (putting through a $0 sales order). One opportunity had an open quote (what my problem above was) but the other has no quotes or transactions other than our sales order for the eval. It also does not show up in the pipeline and opportunity reports so NS must…

What I need to understand is where this is set? Is document status set to 'processed' only if there is a quote that exists? And would I need to lookup all quotes and loop through this document status? Or am I just looking in one place (what record type)? Well I'm thinking that an afterSubmit of the sales order when created…

#2 Done. Unfortunately, this had to be done the old fashion way (through document DOM) as there is no line item for this record, but it works. When an Eval is in the list, the button displays an alert that an eval already is identified rather than allowing them to go to the special sales order form. Would you not be able…

Roadblock #1: The idea of creating a new Opportunity list/record field for the transaction and having the Opportunity be parent so I could have a nice sub-tab that has a button like 'New Eval' doesn't work. For whatever reason, beyond me, you can only 'Attach' sales transactions. There is no 'New...' button like you see…

We've seen the same issue with our account. Does anyone have a defect number for this yet?

Ray, I'm sure there are several other checks that probably should happen (such as for checking to make sure the email address is valid) but I'm not the person to ask for that code. The simplistic version that ONLY checks to make sure the two fields are the exact same would look something like the following: function…

For our purposes #1 and #2 together would provide a huge benefit, but #1 alone wouldn't really help much of anything. You would be referencing an ID for the address but then would have no way of updating its data later.

I assume this isn't currently possible with web services either? If not I'll probably generate an ER for that too.

Nick, This is very much true for 2009.1, however it looks like we can access addresses now by their internal ids in 2009.2. Hooray!

My primary reason for wanting exposure to address internal ids is so I can have multiple customers with the same address updated automatically. This happens a LOT in our market and currently (sadly) just goes unmaintained.

I've noticed general slowness since Monday and have seen reports from others experiencing the same.* We're in the US actually.

"My Team" is all of "my" stuff, plus all of my subordinates' stuff and their subordinates' stuff and their subordinates' stuff and so on. "Unassigned" is stuff that doesn't have an owner. This rule doesn't take group membership into account at all. What we've done to accomplish something similar is create searches based on…

In general the goal is to create an alias from the email address you want customers to send their cases to (support@blah.com) to the email address that NetSuite gives you in Setup > Support > Support Preferences > Inbound Email > NetSuite Address. Because "Linux" itself has nothing to do with this part of your mail server…

Would it be possible to get the issue number your were referring to Evan so I may track this? Thanks, John

Great! Thanks for the reply Tracy

Oh awesome thank you. I can stop my hunt for the NetSuite support number now :)

I'm not able to login to my account for about the same time frame. -_-

I must say the conference blew away my expectations. Thank you to everyone who helped make this such an amazing experience. I am definitely looking forward to next year.

I currently have a trial going for SoapUI Pro, which has the auto population of record types that SoapScope has. This product is cross platform and is only $350 annually as opposed to $800 /shrug I don't really need this enough yet to justify a license myself, but from what I've used of SoapUI Pro it is sufficient for…

The error we were having was resolved, albeit using an ugly workaround to something that I have no idea what the root cause really is. When logging in the SOAP was fine, and the HTTP headers contained just my soapaction and useragent. I was using the 2008.1 and 2008.2 WSDLs (in an effort to find the problem) and connecting…

Svilen, It is working properly now without setting the cookie. My assumption is that our account was on 2008.2 but the web services server thought it was still on 2008.1 for some reason and was returning the older cookie. Thank you for the followup. John

I'm getting (I think) similar behavior. I can't even login anymore without it throwing an unexpected error. One of the ticket ids: fm9l697qf80a2k6yupgi

Another ticket from a fresh session: fmaw3ipvloyy108rptp5

To follow up on this: A support rep and myself determined that the getAsyncResults operation works in our 2008.2 beta account, even when still using the 2008.1 endpoint. I've decided to just wait it out until our upgrade before using asynchronous operations.

Filed case #778370. Thanks