My Stuff
Comments
-
Ok, it seems to not be showing any of the data as long as main line is set to true. But I'm not certain how to narrow my results if I don't have main line enabled. Tried setting mainline true and billing transaction to not none, returned no results. What field on a PO is the Billing Transaction? Perhaps I can make a custom…
-
Oh it's another paid thing? Nevermind then... thanks for pointing that out~
-
Ah, I had to remake the works order, not just the assembly build. Thanks!
-
Sorry, I tried both the master default and various locations but the fields are still un-editable on the assembly build.
-
Yea, but that will remove it from all records, including the item fulfilment record that I still want it to be displayed on.
-
Thanks Nicole~ I'm a bit swamped with tasks at the moment but I'll get back to this and give it a go when I can. Thank you as always for the guidance.
-
Following this and the suite answer. The main cause for the issue was that the 'Document Number Prefix' field on the subsidiary records had been deleted. We've restarted the document numbering at 0 with a new prefix.
-
Sure thing! Here it is at the bottom of a Purchase Order with some example information on it. I'm hoping to be able to have it only show up on Item Fulfilment records.
-
Noticed it was the subsidiary in particular that wasn't working and it's the IS check that isn't valid, needed to be = instead. {subsidiary} = 'MPSL' AND LOWER({createdfrom}) LIKE '%purchase order%'
-
Sorry Jervin, still not I'm afraid. :( Gonna test the two check separately to see which if either works.
-
Hi Jervin, thank you for all your help with my forms over the months. When you want to find how to link to a particular field on your PDFs, workflows or elsewhere. Do you have particular methods that you go through to find the field and test that it works? I've used SuiteBuilder Advanced Templates Reference guide before,…
-
Thanks Pierre~🙏 Amazed you're able to remember so much detail surrounding the cause of the issue.
-
It's something to do with it going onto multiple lines, as soon as the text goes onto a second line it aligns left, but if it fits on the first line it aligns right.
-
Hey! Yea I made the packaging record myself. As the NS packing doesn't offer enough fields for information that we want to add. It is a custom record as shown below, with Item Fulfilment field being the parent to display the packing record as a list (I hope I'm explaining that right) I leaned this from the SuiteScript…
-
Hi Jervin~ I may still be writing this wrong I fear... tried the two following formats. Here's the output from one of them. The fields it's meant to check, Subsidiary and Created From are set as they normally would be.
-
They're empty on some subsidiaries and populated on others. I should find the numbers for each subsidiary when it was last updating and update the initial number to the next missing from the sequence?
-
Followed this post and updated my parent css to include td p { text-align: left;} in the parent CSS but no luck.
-
Sorry, that's not it. The Chinese characters are showing fine if I want them to. But on one of my forms specifically, Chinese customs want to see the total amount of the order printed in both numbers and in Chinese characters. I don't know if there's a way to get NetSuite to convert numbers into Chinese characters without…
-
The form I was using has Inventory Subsidiary and Inventory Location line item fields turned off, enabling them has solved the issue.
-
Thanks, I did try following the suggestion on the linked article of enabling location. Location is already enabled on main, I tried enabling 'Division' which is location for a vendor return auth, but to no avail.
-
Thank you @Angelica Mae Segador-Oracle The top link you shared would be the one I need, but I can't seem to get it to work on all the forms I need. It specifies that it's for a Cash Sale form, which is working for me, and I've managed to get it working on a SO. But the PO might have another script running on it, giving a…
-
Hi @Patrick Fresnosa-Oracle , I haven't tried making standalone invoices before. What part of the process are you suggesting I could use that for? But we are largely dealing with Inventory, Lot & Serialized items. We're also trying to set up Assembly items at the moment.
-
Thank you Patrick. I'm not sure if any of the things you listed are causing the issue. Most of them I've taken into consideration and don't seem to correspond in any way to how I managed to resolve the error this time. I've gotten the email and will be in contact with support to hopefully come to a solution to the issue…
-
Oh, I suppose that makes sense given this message I keep seeing on all the pages. I'm not sure what steps to take then, because none of our items would be Time Phased. I guess I need to read up on Planning Rule Groups and Planning Item Categories. Thanks for the steer~
-
Hey Ely~ We do want to use intercompany sales orders, but we're not able to build them. They have to be generated by building a purchase order and then using Generate Intercompany Sales orders. Doing this also pairs the order which means we can't edit any of the details that would affect the GL impact, so it's a little…
-
Yes, I've gone through each of the steps listed here under the DRP steps. I have 2 bills of distribution. I then added a number of items to the distributions network and category from the item record pages. The items I'm testing with are using Material Requirements Planning as the replen method. There were some demand…
-
This error happened again and I'm still clueless as to how I fixed it this time. Had a Purchase Order to receive in, and again it was saying I couldn't receive more items than I had shipped on an intercompany Transfer Order which in this case we'll call item 501. I had made 3 different IFs where I was testing which items I…
-
Sorry, no feedback I'm afraid.
-
The script file names needed have .js Test Init Script -> Test Init Script.js Even though it already knew the files were javascript. 🤦♂️
-
I can understand the process and it certainly would be a solution. For now we're probably going to fudge it as this is a one off. But I'll be sure to use this as a guide if it becomes more repetitive of a problem for us. Thank you for the detailed advice~