Ivy Lopez-Oracle NSC Guru

Hi @Dhurst, It might not be possible to get all the information you require in just 1 saved search specially since you have the criteria set to Type is Work Order, and the other details you require can be found in the Purchase Order, which is not directly related to the Work Order. However, if you'll be creating a separate…

Hi @User_HPB3I, Thank you for posting another question here in our community! Tagging our experts on this workflows: @Jack Daryl Espiel-Oracle / @Joahnna Given Uy-Oracle / @Kristoffer Viray-Oracle, any ideas? To our other members, feel free to comment your insights as well.

Hi @Benjamin Paul - USA, This is an automatic update that will be applied once your account is upgraded to the 2022.2 version. If you have any scripts, workflows, or custom fields that use or reference field names instead of the internal id, then these might be affected. Prior to your account's upgrade, make sure that you…

Hi @Gabriel Jarillo Soto, Thank you for updating this thread of the workaround you did. I'm sure this will be helpful to other members who might encounter the same concern.

Hi @NitinEOH, I tested this on my account and I noted that users can only link the Customer/Project in the Work Order record. On the succeeding Work Order Issue, Work Order Completion and Work Order Close transactions, it is not possible to add the Customer/Project. Since the Project can't be associated with the WIP…

Hi @Gabriel Jarillo Soto, The workaround I mentioned is for an Item Saved Search, not an Item Location Configuration Search that you are using.

Hi @Gabriel Jarillo Soto, I tested this on my account and encountered the same behavior. Per further checking, it seems like this is a known defect which is filed under Defect # 369085: Saved Search > Location Demand Time Fence and Location Planning Time Fence shows same values. The mentioned defect is pertaining to an…

Hi there @H. Greene, Thanks for posting another concern here in our community! Allow our gurus to check on this one and we'll update this thread of our findings. To our other members, feel free to share your insights on this as well.

Hi @Adam Birk, I remember this recently being asked in another thread. Here's the reply of one of our gurus about this: Feel free to join in the discussion there as well.

Hi @User_GE47I, Were you able to check my previous comment? If it was able to help in your concern, others with the same question might find it helpful as well. By marking “Yes” on the “Did this answer your question?”, you’ll be able to help other community members who might have the same concern find the answer easier and…

Hi @Buckeye1497, Can you send a screenshot of the setup of your custom item field so we can try to test this on our end?

Hi @Gabriel Jarillo Soto, Glad to have you back with us today and thank you for posting your concern here in our community. Allow our gurus to check on this one first and we'll get back to you with our findings. To our other members, feel free to share your insights on this as well.

Hi @paula.courtemanche, Thank you for posting your concern here in our community! Let me tag our guru who can help you with this one: @Michelle Jabanes-Oracle, any ideas? Anyone else experiencing the same? Let us know by commenting on this thread.

Hi @KNason76, I tested this one on my end, and it seems like your requirement is not possible if the assembly in the WO is a regular assembly item, but it is possible if the item is a lot numbered or serialized assembly. Here's an example: For the Detail Frequency (LOT) field in the Quality Inspection, I entered 0 so that…

Hi @User_GE47I, For the possible reasons why COGS is hitting the Assembly Build, please refer to these SuiteAnswers articles: 72599: Assembly Build > Credit Posting to COGS Account 25603: Assembly Build Showing a Debit to Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) 90795: Assembly Build Shows a Debit to Cost of Goods Sold Account When you…

Hi there @LissaM, Glad to have you with us today and thank you for posting your concern here in our community! Tagging our gurus who can assist you on this one: @Jack Daryl Espiel-Oracle / @Joahnna Given Uy-Oracle / @Kristoffer Viray-Oracle, any ideas? To our other members, feel free to share your insights as well.

Hi @User_P5CGP, Welcome to our community! Glad to have you with us today and thank you for posting your concern here. Allow our gurus to review your concern and perform their initial investigation. We will reach out again if we have updates on this. @Leonard Mallare-Oracle, any ideas? To other users, feel free join in the…

Hi @User_CS3KK, Thank you for posting another question here in our community. Allow us to check on this one first, then we'll update you on our findings. Anyone else experiencing or experienced the same? Feel free to share your insights on this thread!

Hi @User_OPUDV, I tried it again on my test account, but was unable to reproduce this concern. Please note that since this requirement is specific to your account, we don't have any available documentation on this one. Also, your requirement might need some complex formula or customization so we recommend that you reach…

Hi @Ian T, Agree with @User_EVVPG on this one. You can also try to clear your cache and/or log out and log back in to check if the field will show. You can also post a new question so we can further help you troubleshoot this one.

Hi @User_OPUDV, Were you able to test the solution provided in my previous comment? Let us know if it worked for you or not. ?

Hi @OliverK, Great to see you again and happy Friday to you as well! I think MIN/MAX function doesn't matter much in your formula since you have it set to "last order by". so it will only give you the closest expected receipt date. The only way to modify this formula is to change "last" to "first" like below:…

It would be possible to test in Sandbox environment once you have purchased the Smart Count bundle. Note that this is a paid bundle/paid SuiteApp so it is best to contact your Account Manager regarding the pricing and availability. To know more about this bundle, you can check SuiteAnswers 106183: SuiteApps: Smart Count.

Hi @KNason76, According to the field help of the Detail Frequency (LOT): Enter the Detail Frequency (number) of inspections created per transaction. • If no number is entered, one inspection is created. • If 0 is entered, one inspection is created for each lot. • If the number 1 is entered, Skip Lot is enabled to skip…

Hi @User_D5W9Z, According to the Q&A PDF file in SuiteAnswers 106183, it is not possible to test this bundle in Release Preview. It would be best to contact your Account Manager regarding the availability of this bundle.

Hi @Radi, By default, there is a Enter Completion with Backflush button on the Work Order. Clicking this button will automatically check the Backflush box in the succeeding Work Order Completion form. However, you mentioned that you use the Enter Completions page, and upon checking, this page is not customizable or…

Hi @David DeLisser, Upon checking, there is no mention of the Item 360 yet in the 2022.2 Release Notes. We suggest to monitor the 2022.2 Release Notes or contact your account manager for the availability of this feature.

Hi @GLL, Looks like you already found the discussion article that I previously wrote about this topic. (Great job on that btw!) Here's the link in case someone else might need it: https://community.oracle.com/netsuite/discussion/4475561/transaction-saved-search-work-order-show-built-qty-and-used-in-build-qty Feel free to…

Hi @GLL, The sample I showed is just a simple search with the Criteria Type = Work Order. The Results fields are: Document Number Item * (This represents Main Line) Quantity Quantity Fulfilled/Received Depending on your requirement, you can also add the Criteria Main Line = True/Yes or False/No: If you set it to Main Line…

Hi @Maurice Shallow, Thank you for posting another question here in our community! Note that we have removed one of the images you sent since it contained sensitive information (address). Allow our gurus some time to check on this one, and we'll update you in this thread. To our other members, feel free to share your…