Discussions
Stay up-to-date with the latest news from NetSuite. You’ll be in the know about how to connect with peers and take your business to new heights at our virtual, in-person, on demand events, and much more.
New AI Community Guidelines. Please review and follow them to ensure AI use stays safe, accurate, and compliant.
Keep an eye out for upcoming NetSuite events, including meetups, workshops, and webinars. These sessions are a great way to connect with peers, learn from experts, and stay current on the latest NetSuite updates and best practices. Registration links are provided in each event.
Save $300 - limited to first 1,000 registrants
Join the NetSuite community to innovate, connect, and discover what’s next.
SuiteWorld brings thousands of innovators, builders, and leaders together to learn, connect, and shape what’s next. This October, explore how to build a stronger foundation for growth through inspiring keynotes, major product reveals, hands-on sessions, and unforgettable moments—all in one place for our biggest event of the year. Register now
Join the NetSuite community to innovate, connect, and discover what’s next.
SuiteWorld brings thousands of innovators, builders, and leaders together to learn, connect, and shape what’s next. This October, explore how to build a stronger foundation for growth through inspiring keynotes, major product reveals, hands-on sessions, and unforgettable moments—all in one place for our biggest event of the year. Register now
How to search UnitsType / UOM (not Base Units) in SuiteScript 2.0?
Long story short, I'm being given the internal id for a unit of measure (unitstype) from a saved search that's been provided to me. I need to take that and match it to a base unit and conversion rate. What's the simplest way to do so?
search.create({ "type": "unitstype", "columns": ["internalid", "name", "unitname", "conversionrate", "baseunit"] });...returns everything, units, base units, the works! Great, right? But the given internal id of each unit is not the actual internal id, but rather the internal id of its base unit. Close but no cigar. Also unexpected and misleading.
Ok, how about instead searching directly for the internal id I've been given?
0