Discussions
Stay up-to-date with the latest news from NetSuite. You’ll be in the know about how to connect with peers and take your business to new heights at our virtual, in-person, on demand events, and much more.
New AI Community Guidelines. Please review and follow them to ensure AI use stays safe, accurate, and compliant.
Keep an eye out for upcoming NetSuite events, including meetups, workshops, and webinars. These sessions are a great way to connect with peers, learn from experts, and stay current on the latest NetSuite updates and best practices. Registration links are provided in each event.
Save $300 - limited to first 1,000 registrants
Join the NetSuite community to innovate, connect, and discover what’s next.
SuiteWorld brings thousands of innovators, builders, and leaders together to learn, connect, and shape what’s next. This October, explore how to build a stronger foundation for growth through inspiring keynotes, major product reveals, hands-on sessions, and unforgettable moments—all in one place for our biggest event of the year. Register now
Join the NetSuite community to innovate, connect, and discover what’s next.
SuiteWorld brings thousands of innovators, builders, and leaders together to learn, connect, and shape what’s next. This October, explore how to build a stronger foundation for growth through inspiring keynotes, major product reveals, hands-on sessions, and unforgettable moments—all in one place for our biggest event of the year. Register now
Item Fulfillment Saved Search
Does anyone know a way to get the package weight out of a transaction saved search on an item fulfillment?
I was using a transaction saved search with my criteria being an Item fulfilled in the last 30 days. The information is under the packages tab inside the item fulfillment. What is crazy is that I can pull the tracking number from this tab but not the total weight of the package or even the individual package weight. However you can see it right next to the tracking number.
I filed case 1116088 and was told this in an enhancement 89367 but wanted to know how others might have tackled this problem.
0