Discussions
Stay up-to-date with the latest news from NetSuite. You’ll be in the know about how to connect with peers and take your business to new heights at our virtual, in-person, on demand events, and much more.
New AI Community Guidelines. Please review and follow them to ensure AI use stays safe, accurate, and compliant.
Keep an eye out for upcoming NetSuite events, including meetups, workshops, and webinars. These sessions are a great way to connect with peers, learn from experts, and stay current on the latest NetSuite updates and best practices. Registration links are provided in each event.
Save $300 - limited to first 1,000 registrants
Join the NetSuite community to innovate, connect, and discover what’s next.
SuiteWorld brings thousands of innovators, builders, and leaders together to learn, connect, and shape what’s next. This October, explore how to build a stronger foundation for growth through inspiring keynotes, major product reveals, hands-on sessions, and unforgettable moments—all in one place for our biggest event of the year. Register now
Join the NetSuite community to innovate, connect, and discover what’s next.
SuiteWorld brings thousands of innovators, builders, and leaders together to learn, connect, and shape what’s next. This October, explore how to build a stronger foundation for growth through inspiring keynotes, major product reveals, hands-on sessions, and unforgettable moments—all in one place for our biggest event of the year. Register now
Saved Search for NET45 and NET90 Terms
Does anyone know why Netsuite ignores the TERMS field when calculating Days Overdue?
I have a Saved Search that drives a workflow to send out first and second notices for 30 days delinquent and 60 days delinquent customers. While this works great for Net30 customers, Net45 and Net90 customers complain that they aren't overdue.
I've yet to come up with a formula that uses terms to subtract from Days overdue to generate the proper notice.
Any thoughts or help on this would be greatly appreciated.
Matt Armfield
Tagged:
0