My Stuff
Review our AI Community Guidelines before posting AI-generated or AI-assisted content. Verify accuracy and include the appropriate AI disclaimer.
Action Required: Review and submit pending reconciliation matches before the NetSuite upgrade to avoid rework. After 26.2, unsubmitted matches will be unmatched. For more details, see SuiteAnswers 1047397
Comments
-
A
-
False
-
False
-
B
-
A. Purchase Order, Item Receipt, Vendor Bill
-
C
-
C
-
True
-
False
-
False
-
Quick thought on this one — the marked answer is False, and I understand the logic (the setting or period can be reopened, so "never" isn't strictly accurate). That said, the word "never" makes the question a bit ambiguous. Read literally, as long as the setting stays False or the period stays closed, the transaction…
-
B
-
False
-
True
-
False
-
B
-
A
-
True
-
Hi @Jervin Nicholas Teopengco-Oracle , Thank you for sharing your insights. From a developer’s perspective, we can effectively manage this issue by utilizing a workflow or SuiteScript alongside a stored field. The current implementation is acceptable, given our technical background. However, from the standpoint of business…
-
Hi @Tigran Shahnazaryan , Yes, when we uncheck 'Store Value', the field behaves as expected. However, we cannot keep this field unchecked for 'Store Value' due to other dependencies.
-
Hi @Glaced99991 , This error usually occurs when the Sales Order doesn't have any item lines that are in a fulfillable state at the time of the transform. A few common causes worth checking: All lines already fulfilled — if every line on the SO has been fully fulfilled in prior IFs, there's nothing left for the transform…