My Stuff
New AI Community Guidelines. Please review and follow them to ensure AI use stays safe, accurate, and compliant.
Comments
-
Changing the users Language settings from English (International) to English (U.K) has solved the issue. To apply this to all users without having them change their language settings, I have to reset the labels of my fields for one language, then change my language settings and do it again. So irritating...
-
Oops, I feel like I've asked this before. 'Ship Via' is the correct field. Perhaps I changed the label from 'Ship Via' to 'Shipping Method' at some point.
-
It's been a while since I used a One World account, but I hope this helps you. From my understanding, an intercompany transaction would have the Subsidiary as Subsidiary A and the customer would be a customer record representing Subsidiary B, is that right? In which case, you could use a numerical formula criterion like…
-
B 😊
-
Hiya, I'm not familiar with this field. Is it simply a checkbox? I'd start by including intercompany as one of your results and letting us know what results that returns. Chances are that since you haven't set Main Line to False as a criterion that intercompany is appearing on lines and not being handled properly. We could…
-
Thanks Richard, that helps clarify my understanding.
-
Thanks Jervin. Just gotta be extra careful then. 😅
-
Solved! There is an undocumented option you can use for submitFields() called disableTriggers record.submitFields({ type: so.type, id: so.id, values, options: { enableSourcing: false, ignoreMandatoryFields: true, disableTriggers: true } });
-
Hi Jervin, this is for future use cases. Is there a guide somewhere on how to use nlapiYieldScript?
-
Hiya, I believe you can do this by setting a criterion of 'Applied to Transaction' is 'Empty' And of course it also needs to be a Transaction type search with a Type criterion of is Journal.
-
This SuiteAnswer lead me to the answer. Creating Inventory Adjustments via SuiteScript Returns Unexpected Error One possible cause for this is because there are customizations that is trying to set the main body Location field on the Inventory Adjustment. The body location field on the Inventory Adjustment record…
-
Never mind, she just had the field group minimized. 😂 Since it was the last field group in the subtab, and the fields below it hadn't been assigned to a field group, it made it look like the fields had disappeared, not that the field group was minimized.
-
Thanks both, sorry for the late reply, just got back from holiday. I appreciate your suggestions and will work on scripting this functionality.
-
Thank you Todd, appreciate the insight. I'll still be taking answers if other people would like to contribute.
-
Thanks Alex, doing so did not reveal a NetSuite 360 role option on my employee record roles, but it did give me access into the NetSuite 360 dashboard through the support page that was my main goal.
-
Thanks Alex.
-
False statement, I can actually edit the Inline HTML fields with a Client Script. So now on a fieldChanged function and if the field is entity I do the following: try { var specialInstructions = currentRecord.getValue({ fieldId: 'custbody_special_instructions' }); if (specialInstructions) { var html1 = '<div…
-
Thanks Trixie. Yea I think it's similar that in my case because it was outsourced I just need to close the Purchase Order instead. Frustrating there doesn't seem to be a direct way to edit the quantity. Thanks for the additional info.
-
Thanks Jervin, it means a lot to know you think my approach is correct. Unfortunately I don't have much way to reduce the number of operations. Generally it is unlikely to be editing the same record at the same time, these updates come in large batches where moving 1 task in the route order then affects 20 other orders in…
-
Dumb workaround = CASE WHEN LENGTH({custbody5}) > 0 THEN '<div style="background-color:yellow; color:black; font-weight:bold;">' || {custbody5} || '</div>' ELSE 'Empty' END
-
I just ended up closing the attached purchase order which automatically closed the WO as well. Would be good if someone still has an idea of how I can get it into a state where I'm able to amend it though, as I would rather not have to close the orders and recreate them just to be able to make edits.
-
Thank you Michelle, very helpful suggestions and insights.
-
Yea that also could have been a solution. Thanks Angela Too many accounts to map individually for this project so I would have again chosen to use the Restricted to Department of each account to define the Department for the vendor.
-
Unchecking the Store Value checkbox on my new list field on the Vendor record is now filling it with the Department data.
-
Thank you both for the advice. I would try to build my own available fields and columns to store the info I need, but I think for the purposes of the greater task I'll just ignore the kit items and will be dropping this idea for now.
-
Thanks Angela, that does make sense but doesn't quite help answer my question and all of our kit items don't have the Display Components option turned on. I'm just looking for if there's a way or not for me to get the value of the Available column off of transactions with a transaction search. The only way I can reach the…
-
Applied to Transaction, I forgot about that one. Thank you so much Judith
-
Support unfortunately sent me around in circles but it did help me to keep going at it and I have somehow managed to solve it by using the commerce category instead of the dynamic item list. I don't understand why the item list didn't work, it was clearly blocking the customer from purchasing the items, but it was supposed…
-
Thanks Richard, I'll reach out to them and report back with their findings.
-
A