Hi @User_RLV0D, Good day! Sending a follow up on this in case you haven't read my previous reply. Thanks!

Hi @User_MPUJU, Good day! Sending a follow up on this in case you haven't read our previous replies. Thanks!

Hi @User_HK60E, Can you send a screenshot of the Workflow log? So that we could check if the Send Email executed successfully as seen below: Also, have you checked under Setup > Company > Email Preferences > Sandbox and Release Preview subtab if you have selected an option here? Thanks!

Hi @User_MPUJU, Good day! I agree with Chelsea. It could be that your Sales Order has a Drop Ship or Special Order item which could create a Purchase Order from the Sales Order. With this, can you confirm if the Purchase Order is created from a Sales Order? Also providing screenshots of the System Notes would be helpful.…

Oi, Você tentou acessar os registros do navegador? Estou aqui, você pode obter os IDs de campos padrão por registro. E também, você pode adicionar esse código &xml=T no final da URL e isso irá mostrar os campos de um registros no formato XML, como visto abaixo: Nos deixe saber como isso ficou.

Hi @User_S6FVQ, Good day! I would like to confirm if you've seen Tigran Shahnazaryan & MTL_MIA's insights above? Thanks!

Hi @User_RLV0D, I would like to confirm if this is a Custom Form for a Standard Transaction or a Custom Transaction Type? Upon checking on our test account, the Field Groups subtab is visible on both as seen below: Thanks!

Hi @Chan Man, You're correct. Unfortunately, we can't add these permissions to the Employee Center Role yet. This is logged and being tracked under Enhancement 114922 Advanced Job tracking> Expose Projects via Employee Center You can vote for this enhancement on the SuiteIdeas page. At this time, there is no documented…

Hi @Aruna Madabhushi, Thanks for letting us know. It seems like the errors are being handled within the code itself. Would you be able share the code snippet for this? Thanks!

Oi, Gostaria de acompanhar este tópico. Por favor, nos informe se precisar de mais ajuda. Se o comentário anterior ajudou em sua preocupação, por favor clique em "Sim" em "Isso respondeu sua pergunta?". Isso ajudará outras pessoas com a mesma pergunta a encontrar facilmente a resposta correta. Você também pode ganhar…

Hi @Maxeem-83, Good day! Sending a gentle follow up on this in case you haven't read our previous reply. Thanks!

Hi @Jordan Cohen, Good day! I've created an article before similar to your concern. Can you confirm if this is what you're looking for? Let me know how it goes! 😁 __ If you find this reply to your question as helpful, others with the same question might find it helpful as well. By marking “Yes” on the “Did this answer your…

Hi @Maxeem-83, You're welcome! 😁 Upon coordinating this with our SCM team, here's some of the known enhancements files for Advanced Bill of Materials: Enhancement #487386: SCM > Advanced Bill of Materials = True> Bill of Materials/ Bill of Materials Revision Saved Search> Ability to retrieve the Internal ID of the…

Oi, Você já tentou ter uma condição "if" na qual ela só será impressa se ${tax.taxtype} tiver os valores de IPI? Algo como: <#if tax.taxtype == "IPI_BR"> ${tax.taxtype} </#if> Infelizmente, não podemos confirmar se isso funciona, pois não podemos tentar isso em nossas contas de teste devido à configuração de suas…

Hi @PatrickConrad, Upon further checking, the Value field only displays several Line fields (not all line fields from the SO) when using the Join field, Created From: On my test account, I was able to get values from the SO line to the PO line using this formula. In this example, I tried to get the Class (Line) field from…

Hi @JPrice, Would you be able to set the script to execute on Inventory Items only? So that we could confirm if this is what's causing the error. Let us know how it goes!

Oi, Você mencionou que o modelo ainda não está permitindo que você faça alterações mesmo ao usar apenas o Código-fonte. Com isso, eu gostaria de confirmar se o modelo que você está usando foi criado do zero ou este ainda é o modelo onde você usou o modo WSYIWYG? Obrigado!

Hi @Marie4455, Good day! Sending a follow up on this in case you haven't read my previous reply. Thanks!

Hi @Maxeem-83, Good day! Yes we can add hyperlinks to the workaround. Try adding this to your formula: REPLACE(NS_CONCAT('<a href="https://xxxxxx.app.netsuite.com/app/common/item/item.nl?id='||{internalid}|| ' " target="_blank" >' || {name} || '</a>'),',', '<br>') Note: replace the url with your account id Unfortunately,…

Hi @JPrice, From the XML you've sent, yes, it should be returning values instead of undefined. With this, have you tried using log.debug to ensure if we are getting values? You can set it after getting the values of storeDisplayName as seen below: const storeDisplayName = itemRec.getValue({ fieldId: 'storedisplayname'…

Hi @bobrementizo, Good day! Sending a follow up on this in case you haven't read our previous replies. Thanks!

Hi @Marie4455, The Script ID for Financial Row Layouts are primarily used for customization, referencing, and scripting. The Script ID also serves as a unique identifier for the Financial Row Layout. Here's a SuiteAnswers article that utilizes the Script ID: SuiteAnswers 100996: Financial Reports as XML Definitions I hope…

Hi @Maxeem-83, Good day! Sending a follow up on this in case you haven't read my previous reply. Thanks!

Hi @Maxeem-83, Unfortunately, this is a current limitation and an Enhancement has already been filed for this. This is logged and being tracked under Enhancement 783789 Assembly Item > Related Records > Show Parent Assembly You can vote for this enhancement on the SuiteIdeas page. A workaround for this it so create a…

Hi @bobrementizo, Based on the error, it seems like the format is changed for the internalid. With this, would you be able to confirm if the 2nd script manipulates the values of 'id' before executing the search? Also, since we're not able to replicate this behavior in our test accounts, I would like to ask if you already…

Hi @Adam W, Unfortunately, I'm unable to replicate this in our test accounts wherein the Class and Department is editable. I would like confirm if you did something else besides ticking the Include checkboxes for Class and Department? Thanks!

Hi @Adam W, For the Department and Class fields under the Classification field, we can edit this via Customize > Customize Form on the top right corner of the page: Under the Screen Fields subtab, we can set the Display Type to Disabled as seen below: Once done, the Class and Department body field should not be editable…

Hi @Adam W, Would you be able to confirm on how you've added the Department and Class fields on your Components sublist? When I tried this on my test account via the Customize button, the fields were not editable: Thanks!

Hi @Mahmoud Alshami, You're welcome, glad you were able to solve this! We had the same approach on my end wherein I used the same filtering logic: Thanks as well!

Hi @Honey Soe, Good day! Sending a follow up on this in case you haven't read my previous reply. Thanks!