Looks like the debugger isn't going to work with POST events on SiuteLets?! Issue Number 148108 Type Defect Severity S2 - Urgent Status Closed - As Designed Release Target 2Q 2009 Major Release Case 738342 Defect 148108: Debugger is not picking up on suitelet?…

Yeah, I'm an idiot. To get the values that are BEING EDITED you need to call nlapiGetCurrentLineItemValue()

Steve, The credit actually goes to Yang. Thanks Amit Oh Yang get's too much attention! :p

Amit(QA) and Barry(Support) found the clue! I had a parameter in my url to my SuiteLet called 'id' - this parameter worked perfectly fine for about a year, but since 2008_2 it must be used by NetSuite somewhere behind the scenes. The tricky part about this problem is that none of the code was throwing the error, it was…

Is it complaining specifically about REC_IDS.PATIENT_ASSESSMENT or do all calls to nlapiSubmitField(...) throw this error? Thanks, Yang I've determined that it's not the enum names that are causing a problem. A single line update executed in the debugger works fine, but when executing in the context of my SuiteLet it…

It looks like you are wanting to filter on the internal id change: filters[0] = nlobjSearchFilter('entityid','customer','is','53'); to: filters[0] = nlobjSearchFilter('internalid','entityid','is','53'); I think that will do it, but I'm going from memory so...

so far I have only seen it with this specific record type. I'm working with Barry in support and he requested I do a simple test in the debugger and it worked fine. I'm in the process of replacing me 'enum' values with string values and trying again.

I may be encountering the same problem or maybe I just don't understand this method. Here is MY scenario: I have a custom record call Physician 'custrecord_physician' which has a field; custrecord_patient | List/Record | Customer | Record Is Parent I'm trying to attach a physician record to a customer record using this…

I see the issue in the system and we're taking a look. In the meantime can you try loading and submitting the record? Thanks, Yang The following code works fine: var rec = nlapiLoadRecord('customrecord_pat_assessment', '468'); nlapiSubmitRecord(rec);

If this is a defect I've encountered, the workaround is: var patients = nlapiLookupField('customrecord_physician', '5', 'custrecord_patient'); var pieces = patients.split(','); pieces.push( 2503 ); nlapiSubmitField('customrecord_physician', '5', 'custrecord_patient', pieces); EDIT: I had a strange phenomenon happen but…

I see the issue in the system and we're taking a look. In the meantime can you try loading and submitting the record? Thanks, Yang Oh how this problem has changed! I've narrowed it down to this: function Run(request, response) { response.writePage(nlapiCreateForm('Patient Assessment')); } THAT will throw the error!!

Hello, My boss cringes every time I want to add a custom script to any forms to do simple things such as auto fill certain fields. He heard from a consultant (who will remain nameless for obvious reasons) that adding custom scripts is a bad idea, because when Netsuite releases an update it may "break" the script. My…

I spoke too soon I'm afraid. I either just encountered a very strange bug or I'm REALLY confused still how these things work. I created 2 parameters for a specific script 3 days ago. [LIST] [*]both free form text [*]store value = "T" [*]company preference[/LIST]This script has 3 deployments so far (many more planned) and…

Steve, The values you specify on the company preferences page override the values you specify on the deployment record if the script parameter is configured as a company setting. Does that make sense? Thanks, Yang It does make sense, sure. What is strange is that until I "touched" the company preferences the deployment…

I have an existing saved search I'm calling via "var searchresults = nlapiSearchRecord( 'invoice', 57, filters, null );" The search contains the date, amount and item internalID fields of all 'invoice' transactions. I can retrieve the date and itemID fields easily enough using searchresult.getValue( 'internalid', 'item' )…

Hi Kate, Thanks for the confirmation! (I started using it anyway, once I saw it worked I just couldn't control myself) :p

Hello, Hoping this is possible. We are trying to create a clientscript attached to our inventory item form so that when we enter an item let say item number 200 the script finds finds a related item number let say 200-GB then pulls info out of that item record? "When we enter an item number" - what do you mean? You say…

Bummer that none of these suggestions or requests have been implemented. The debugger seems to have been released and then no enhancements at all since then. Fingers crossed for 2011.2 Anyone else wish to see it enhanced and improved?

Update: I added the fourth parameter and it does indeed fix the problem. Very good!!

Have you looked at "Pro JavaScript Design Pattens" by Ross Harmes, and Dustin Diaz? I think it explains prototypal inheritance very well, and explains options for and examples of implementing classical (C family) style inheritance with JavaScript. Also, the prototype framework does a very solid job supporting inheritance…

Hi Steve, Sorry for the confusion it seems hard to explain. We offer any themed "Cookie Bouquet" as a "Gift Basket" as well. So on our site we want to be able to have a link that says "Turn This Into A Gift Basket" which will link over to related "Gift Basket". I realize that I could use the Related Products feature but we…

Google is good :) From a quick scan I liked this one... http://www.webdeveloper.com/forum/showthread.php?t=150420

Issue Number 154377 Type Defect Severity S3 - Important Status Open - Work In Progress Release Target 4WK of Oct 2008 Case 788861 Defect #154377: nlobjList renders messed up Abstract: The fourth argument of the addColumn method of nlobjList is being Ignored. Details: The layout of the rendered list created using nlobjList…

I read that. They are still aiming for OOP capabilities in Harmony. I always thought the plan for ECMAScript 4.0 was potentially unrealistic in terms of being implemented anytime soon, and may never have ended up in IE. With this new approach, hopefully we'll have something in our lifetime. And, getting all the browsers to…

Enhancements for doing OOP in Javascript are coming in future versions of the language. Thanks, -e Oh Evan... you haven't heard the terrible news? All the involved parties couldn't agree so they trashed the ECMAScript 4.0 spec. It really is a bummer...

The next field argument should be a field name and not an nlobjField reference. I will look into making this work with both types but for now pass the field name (isinactive) instead of the field object reference. Thanks, Yang Aaaahhhh.... jeeze! I must of just had it in my head that this is how it "should" be and wasn't…

If you see the value in this, please vote for it. I'm sure this would be a VERY easy thing for them to do. Enhancement 150867 - SSS: Ability to change directly the defaultaddress field in a customer record

EDIT: Looks like enhancement 84625 is already tracking this. I also just received this email: Enhancement 9674: - Phone calls/Tasks> ability for administrators to delete phone calls/tasks that they have not organised.

**bump** Anyone seen anything like this? Any ideas?

The key to OOP with javascript is to not attempt to make it behave like "traditional" OO languages like java or c#. I found that the best place to get a good solid introduction to the javascript language is to watch Douglas Crockford's videos that are available at Yahoo's YUI theatre. He will give you a much better…