User_Q3A12 Red Ribbon

@Angela Bayliss Yes, we'll send a support case for this.

@Angela Bayliss yes we have done that too.

Yes @Angela Bayliss

@Angela Bayliss i am using the custom role employee center but i also made sure to provide permissions for vendor bills.

Hi @Angela Bayliss we are the using the one under Set up > Approval Process Manager > Approval Rule List. When i reviewed the bundles, we have SuiteApprovals Version 2026.1.2. I also dont see a SuiteApp version.

Hi @Angela Bayliss i did the same but i cannot see the portlet as well as approve and reject buttons. My SuiteApprovals were set up correctly because the people using the employee center are being assigned as approvers.

Hi @Fartleby do you still remember what script did you update to make this work?

Hi @Cherry Eunice B Licyayo-Oracle we can now close this one. Thank you.

Thank you very much, Angela and Nina!

Here show's the parent:child. That is why I had to improvise and add new columns that will only show account and name. However, when i removed the sorting, it shows doubling accounts.

Hi @Angela Bayliss however, client wants to have the account number and name only. If we use the standard field column on the TB report the structure also shows the parent (Parent:child name)

Hi @Niña Camille G. Paule-Oracle - is there a workaround there? I want to create a report that allows me to remove the groupings and sort it by number.

Hi @Red Velasco-Oracle if we need to store 4k + values. Are there alternatives to do it? Perhaps using a custom record?

Hi @Angelica Mae Segador-Oracle - what i noticed was that when the accounting preference checkbox is unchecked. This page is now lost or deactivated. So is this page dependent on that checkbox and a WF?

Hi @Pratik Teredesai-Oracle - I tried this solution however we are using the expense line instead of the items. In creation of a WF, is there an option for expense line?

Hi @Angelica Mae Segador-Oracle just an additional question. Will this page ever work if we dont have a Workflow in place? Like without the customization of using a WF.

Hi @Angelica Mae Segador-Oracle the vendor payments do not currently have a workflow in place. However, the vendor payment in accounting preferences - approval routing was checked. So it looks like we need a WF so that this page will work. Please see the error showing up below:

@Angela Bayliss so that means that we need to incorporate the conditions in this WF (two level approval and dollar threshold) to the new Three Way Match WF right?

@Angela Bayliss Sure here is the original Vendor Bill Approval that we need to incorporate with the Three Way Match Approval Workflow.

Hi Team - i feel like it requires a Workflow for you to use this page. Is that correct?

Thank you Pratik!

Hi @Pratik Teredesai-Oracle This is how it looked like When I click the sublist action group, this page looks different. It is not the same as your screenshot where I can choose the field.

Hi @Tigran Shahnazaryan do we have articles that explains this standard behavior of NetSuite?

Okay I can test this

Hi @Pratik Teredesai-Oracle please see my configurations. However, it still did not work. I wanted to use the sublist option but its only for the item subtab and no option for the expense option. I have a feeling that this configuration is when the field is on the body.

Hi @Judith Culanding-Oracle so does that mean that every time we try to open a transaction list, it will always default to the last "list" we have opened. For example, I opened the Vendor bill list and selected a specific view. Then I opened the Journal Entry list, it will default to the last list I opened in the vendor…

Let me test this one out.

Hi @Pratik Teredesai-Oracle i followed the configration but it still did not work. What should we change here?

Hi @Pratik Teredesai-Oracle how can i know the actual field ID of a field on the line level? "Condition: {item.custcol_constituent} IS NOT NULL (replace with actual field ID for "Constituent")." I tried to do this WF but it did not work and I have a feeling its because of the constituent.

Hi Pratik, I will be testing this solution and provide you an update within the week. Thank you.