Discussions
Stay up-to-date with the latest news from NetSuite. You’ll be in the know about how to connect with peers and take your business to new heights at our virtual, in-person, on demand events, and much more.
Now is the time to ask your NetSuite-savvy friends and colleagues to join the NetSuite Support Community! Refer now! Click here to watch and learn more!
Update your Profile with your Support type to get your Support Type badge.
Uncover the power of data with the Analytics Hub —your ultimate guide to mastering NetSuite Saved Searches and Reports. Simplify the complex and unlock your organization's true potential. Dive into the Analytics Hub now and soar to new heights!
To help you get the most out of your 2025.2 Release Preview account, review the topics outlined in the 2025.2 Release Preview Guide.
Nominate Your Peers for NetSuite Support Community's Choice of the Quarter! Submit your nomination today.
Intelligent Payment Automation version 1.0.3 is now available in the SuiteApp Marketplace. The SuiteApp, powered by BILL, lets you automate payments, manage vendor details, and bank account information within NetSuite. Learn more
Confusing feedback from NS RE elimination
We have following structure
Parent
Sub A (sub of Parent)
Sub B (sub of Parent)
Sub C (sub of Parent)
Historically, all intercompany transactions were between Parent & Subs.
Now, we will begin having intercompany SO/PO between Sub A and Sub B (IE, at the child level).
In a conversation with Netsuite, a colleague was told that for this to eliminate properly, an artificial hierarchy must be created to allow for more elimination companies, IE
Parent
Sub A (sub of Parent)
Sub B (sub of Sub A)
This seemed incorrect to me, that the elimination subsidiary at the level of Sub A-C (above) should be able to eliminate transactions between A/B, B/C, C/A, etc.
0