the system recorded depreciation for previous years on many of the fixed assets and none on other assets. This sentence is what made me think that you hadn't created the Acquisition and set the assets to begin depreciation for the remaining value of the mid life assets. If you have a mid life asset- that as of September…

OK, For the 8 that didn't depreciate- Is the depreciation start date set? Is 'Depreciation active' set to true? Is the Last depreciation period set to zero (for the acquisition)

A

It sounds like you didn't load your mid life assets correctly. For any mid life assets, you will need to load the current Net Book Value, accumulated depreciation, etc. Look up Loading mid life assets in Suiteanswers. You should find the information there.

The easiest way to set up a new role is to run a comparison against a similar role so that you can see the permissions. Setup>Users/Roles>Show role differences. This will provide a comprehensive list of permissions you can possibly assign. I hope this helps!

Since When you log into MyLearn, do you see the notice?

External ID's must be unique for each type of record. If you have an external ID for an account, that would not be the same as an external ID for an item.

If you remove the vendor name, there may still be a balance in the account. Since you can assign a vendor name to ANY JE, if the account is AP- you will have an open balance for 'No Vendor' in AP. To avoid this, you can create a new JE that is the reverse of the entry you are trying to clear.

The mandatory MFA alert on the top of this community is relating to this community only, at least that's how this reads. Since we already sign in using SSO for Oracle, I don't know if this means we have to use the authenticator app. This should NOT impact NetSuite logins.

If the JE is in a closed period, and you cannot edit it, create a new JE reversing the Original. You can 'apply' the new JE to the old one, and that will also clear the balance. If you simply clear the name, Judith is correct - the AP credit will appear on your aging as 'no vendor' and that credit amount.

Many apps or add ons have a 'Built for NetSuite' connector. This is a big selling point - which is why people are pointing you to the vendor to ask about a connector. Building a custom integration is a lot of work. Good luck and let us know?

I am able to include Next Approvers in searches all the time. For example - I add 'My Purchase Orders to Approve' reminders to dashboards where Next Approver = Mine. The next approver field is available for searches when approval routing is turned on for the record types. Find your approval routing types of records at…

If you're just looking to add the subsidiary and sales rep fields into your search: Edit the search Under 'filters' add in 'Subsidiary' & 'Sales Rep'. Save. Now, when you set the subsidiary, the sales rep list may be filtered to only the reps associated with that subsidiary. If that's what you're looking for, I hope this…

When the inventory detail is populated, the status/bin etc are visible. When adding multiple, I don't believe you can natively edit what shows- it can be done via scripting - but that's more than I can give you here. I'm sorry it's not the answer you want.

Setup>Accounting> Accounting Lists Select terms. Edit a term, or create a new one. Name it. Provide the available discount Provide the date until the discount expires. Save. Note the term will be available to both vendors and customers on transaction records.

Common question. In my experience, you cannot report on activities that are marked as private in searches when the results are run by anyone other than the admin. Just what I've found. Might be different with new releases, etc.

In that case, create a custom field on the expense report of type = employee. Have the field mapped to the employee in the imports. (edited) Now this field should appear in your 'recipients from results' list. Sometimes you have to bend NetSuite a little bit. 🙄

Of course there isn't. NetSuite is really lacking in continuity sometimes. Egads!! My apologies. However, if you're trying to send the email to the employee who created it, I would choose 'created by' from my options. See if that works for you?

THis is not something that can be done natively or with a workflow. You could script this, the only other thing is to retrain and ensure users are not entering spaces. Sorry it's not the answer you want.

On the recipients from results, try 'entity'. That should do the trick. 😉

The only way to remove the JE from the 'apply' subtab, is to edit the JE, and in the 'Name' field, clear the vendor name. Thats it. Edit the JE, remove the vendor name from the name field, save the JE. Voila! It won't appear on the vendor as a transaction anymore. I hope this helps!

You won't be able to restrict the created by to anyone but all active users. You can add the filter of 'Sales Rep', and filter by sales reps only, if desired. I hope this helps!

Hey Sam, To understand integrations, you need to understand some basics first. If you're using a custom built API - meaning you are going to build it from scratch- you would use Oath. If you're using a middleware (the one I know most about) you will need: An Employee record with a login (I often use Integration 1, or the…

Awesome. Some of the layers are buried in odd places. Glad I could help!

(I also check the script logs for the time the unexpected error of death appears with any regularity - reproducible I mean)

Your filter is restricting records to item receipts only - so the 'applying transaction' will give you a reference as to what the associated vendor bill is, but it won't provide you with the details of the bill. What specific results are you trying to return? The details of the bill and the item receipts that apply? Or the…

You're very welcome. Sorry it's not clean and pretty - sometimes the truth kicks rocks. It is what it is though - Merging items isn't something I believe will happen. Good luck!

There are many layers within NetSuite, so there are multiple ways to do this. The simplest way - if you want all employees with full access to see the equipment records - is to update the Custom record permission level to 'No Permissions needed' - but that doesn't sound like what you want. Are you trying to provision…

Did you edit the subsidiaries and apply the new Nexus to them? I missed this once, took me a couple days to find. So many layers in NetSuite! I hope this helps!

C