Yes. View GL Impact link on all transactions.

Ah, I see. I'm afraid I have no insight on that.

I'm not clear on where you are seeing "Data Storage". Under Billable Information, you have "Total Storage Size" and "File Cabinet Size". Total includes transactions and File Cabinet is, as the name implies, just documents in your cabinet.

Total Storage includes the space used by your actual records (customers, transactions, etc). Since there is no archiving method, you have no control on this.

You have several options. 1. If you want to ask support questions to NetSuite Support, then you need to have a Support contract with them. Perhaps you do not, which is why they are referring you back to your Partner (however, this seems odd to me since NS wouldn't wether or not your Partner can support you - they should be…

I believe you would need to run a custom integration to a 3rd party address verification system at that point. Basically, I don't think it can be done out of the box.

If you're going to use Revenue Commitments, just testing it out in Sandbox isn't really going to be enough. The Rev Rec module, particularly when using Rev Commits, is complex and requires thorough understanding, or you're going to mess up your account. I would recommend you either spend a considerable amount of time…

What is your business, what is the use case? Are we talking professional services, time billed? Trying to understand the business case where you need to accrue revenue. If it's profesional services you may have several options, just need to understand the business case more.

Your assesment is correct. We have often provided customizations for clients, where we provide functionality (either a custom field when need is simple, such as "Invoice Contact Email" and "SO Contact Email", or an entire custom record for customers with more complex needs) and then scripting to copy/paste the correct…

There is no functionality to recall an email in NetSuite, though you could pretty simply send a second email that says "The user wishes to recall the previous email", since that is all recalling an email really does anyway.

Hi Scott, I can confirm the limitation you face. It would, of course, have been nice for your implementation team to warn you of this limitation in advance, but odds are they didn't know. The two options you highlight are also your best course of action. I would tend towards option #2, but option 1 can be workable too.…

Using an Inventory Adjustment worksheet is a good general idea, though back-dating it 6 months ago, while not a bad idea, it a little bit more of a "hmmm" thing. It will cause all COGS recalculations from that point on to reclaculate. Note that these recalculations may take over 24 hours to complete - so don<t look at your…

Bundling saved search will always cause the bundler to also add to the bundle every single custom field your searches use. There is nothing you can do to stop the bundler from doing this, and you cannot opt out of installing the fields. Thus, if you don't want to install the fields, creating the searches by hand is a safer…

The main impact is that you'll see customers come up in lists as "Parent name: Child name". On the Parent's record, you'll also have access to see consolidated financial information, such as open balance sum for all child. There aren't really any downsides or gotchas that I can think of and, in any case, you can break the…

I would have said that you want the Unit of Measure functionality, right until you said you were going to offer lower prices. Unit of Measure allows you to define different units, but they act as a pure multiplier. I think you might need to go custom just to handle the reduction in price. Oh, another thing that just popped…

Hi Kevin, NetSuite does indeed allow you to insert a new parent node if your current company is not to be the new parent. So, Subsidiary A can indeed have a parent.

There is no ill effect to simply enabling the feature because it is passive. Customers that are not in a parent-child relationship are wholly unaffacted. Thus simply turning on the feature is harmless.

Nope. Looked at the same issue recently. Client wanted s certain policy for users, but a certain other (less frequent changes) for WS users. It isn't possible - ALL users must follow the same policy.

Well, the COGS impact will *necessarily* belong to the warehouse. So, the question is then - where do you want your income to go? If the answer is that you want revenue and COGS to be together, then set the SO (and Invoice) line locations to be the warehouse. If you don't care to tie COGS to Income, then you can set your…

See this post: https://usergroup.netsuite.com/users/forum/product-areas/multi-org-consolidation/350634-multi-org-possible-without-one-world

Sounds like a candidate for a Custom Transaction Type. NetSuite's standard module flow doesn't really have anything for this. You don't have to go custom transaction type, but it's probably the cleanest. Otherwise, I'm thinking maybe some Journals, or maybe even a Vendor Bill using non-inventory placeholders, and then to…

The way the NS tax engine works, you should NOT be marking customer as non-taxable if they are out of Nexus. NS will automatically take care of not charging taxes on orders for these customers, even if they aren't specifically marked as Non-Taxable, since NS looks at the shipping address and thus knows if its within nexus…

You're going to have to use Journals to redirect your COGS to the store. NetSuite has no means to putting your COGS anywhere else than the warehouse Location from which the goods were fulfilled from. A/R goes to 1 place. A/R follows the body-level C/L/D provided. Thus, if you have per-line C/L/D, it is then logical that…

Sub B has to close. NetSuite offers no other options at this time. It has to be an understood business process when running OneWorld that everyone must close at roughly the same time, or not close at all.

We built for another client in the services industry that pretty much had the exact same problem a sort of "Invoice billable customers" functionality, exact for Bills. "Bill billable vendors" I guess you could call it. It allowed you to mark Vendor time entries as ready to be paid and then run a process that generated a…

Tick in the "Inactive" checkbox.

Yeah, that's as designed.

Using Multiple Calendars or not? If you use multiple calendars, you can just create a new calendar and assign it. The downside is that all prior reporting now also uses the new calendar, but the upside is that this takes like 5 minutes to do. Otherwise... not pretty.

You need to contact your Account Manager and buy a new licenses, specifying they are for your Partner. There is no actual configuration to them. It's a "gentlemen's agreement" that you will actually use them in the intended way.

This is new to me, but if you want to detail your requirements a little I can try to spot where your challenges would be and maybe what to do about them