Silly as this may sound you might just try filing a case with support. Show screen captures in an attached word doc to the case. Works for me from time to time.

On your Transaction Form (PO). Sublists>Items. Then Click the Items row and drag it to the top. End result attached

You could probably use the Web Query in reports to build a file that can be updated on demand with a refresh. ODBC might be overkill for a simple grid (not to mention it costs money and is one more thing to track).

Perhaps bad news but...I have had emails show in that native display that never actually fired off.

Yeah I think that will show me what it is when the release phases are going. I really want to know an instance like right this second is the account a leading or lagging version...I think the answer is Top Secret

You could do this without scripting and simply use the workflow engine for a Show Message action. I think it would take about 30 minutes to put together

Sorry but you have to get the paid reference my account premium to get those abilities

Despite the attempt to be paperless in the workplace I frequently found this to be frustrating. It seems it would be simple to apply and should be out of the box

I think this was asked in another forum. Isn't what you are looking for the Tax Codes / Groups? Tax Groups are found in the records browser. can you utilize that?

I would advise using the system as-is. Should you need to assign a Employee ID you can simply create a custom field to store this information.

I cant help you with demand planning but historical data can be imported using Opening Balance offset accounts. Go read the user guide for more. Its pretty easy make a shell for your records to track. If you want lots of detail you are possibly wasting time

Hi Craig, Could you clarify what you mean by translations? You mentioned items and COA in the same request making me uncertain

Are the users that need to see the other languages in those other subsidiaries? For instance you have a Japan subsidiary and users in that Japan Sub.Have you tested to see if the Japanese users see things in Japanese?

If you have subsidiary records you have OneWorld

Hi Jamie It doesn't sound much different than any other data migration. As long as you understand the NS architecture you will do fine. Start with top level records and work on tying out the sublists etc next. Make good use of External ID's to map data appropriately. Sometimes for simple things its worth contracting…

Next question. OneWorld account or Standard?

that doesn't make any sense at all. getDataCenterUrl is the right method. It brings back the right domain every time I test in SOAPUI. I send AccountNumber_SB2 and I get the right netsuite domain. I send AccountNumber and I get the correct NA3 datacenter

What in the world does that mean? If we use getDataCenterUrls it wont work?

Very interested in hearing how this goes...

Thanks JJ. I do know that. The permissions have not changed. Also by seeing the reject button we can confirm the permissions are there but something isnt firing in the native default netsuite script

I hesitate to ever use the phrase "dumb question" ever again and with the Admin Certification and multiple accounts being managed I'm pretty sure I qualify as "Expert". That said this doesnt mean we don't have to navigate the rabbit hole to figure out the what is different about this record vs the other three. There are a…

There are 2 kinds of Approval Routing that can be "turned on". See the attached screen shots of one of my accounts. I have Approval Routing turned on under Enable Features but I have the SuiteFlow side of things turned OFF under Accounting Preferences Approval Routing. In this account i use default NetSuite behavior. if I…

How did you remove the Other Relationship? That alone has my attention

dumb question. For this entity is the customer ID and Company name different? I think the Global Search keys off of ID first.

The Accounting Approval is just a checkbox right? Do you have it exposed on your form?

Ugh. This is one I would toss to support and force them to escalate it up to the technical group which in turn should force an explanation of expected behavior

have you checked your Outlook Sync Config?

It would be nice wouldn't it? Do you know you can alter transactions in closed period as long as it doesn't have a GL impact? its an election on the Accounting Period Management and its per period. Helps when you have notes etc that need updated.

this was solved. turns out there is an option under the Selection column for contacts that includes "Current Record" Poof! problem solved

Your implementation specialist is dodging it for the very reason Olivier just stated. I have altered my subs and set up subs for my past employers and I can assure you the only thing stopping you is a promise. They could always audit your account (highly unlikely) and see that you were using CRM transaction and Opps etc in…