My Stuff
Comments
-
Argh! https://usergroup.netsuite.com/users/showthread.php?t=11626&highlight=CASE Bugs, bugs, bugs
-
On the phone with support. It's an enhancement!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!!?!?!?!
-
A much simpler example: TO_NUMBER({custrecord_pat_assess_due_time_seconds}) This also throws an Invalid Expression error?
-
This is addressed in 2008.2. When there is a standard child (either of a custom parent or a standard parent) we will add a search join. Note, however, we are architecturally limited to one search join per parent/child relationship, so we have to use the search which is the "least common ancestor" of the child standard…
-
We are thinking about a way that even if you group columns the drill down can go straight to the record but we don't have a solution for that yet - it will probably be an option in the search. Thanks, -e That would be great. As it works right now I can't use it. My users will never understand why they click on a patient…
-
It isn't in the release notes, however I believe it made it into the release. Did you try it on beta? Hi Evan, I just tried it with the Beta and I do see the Join listed - GOOD! However I'm wondering if you can help with one more thing... I want to display the COUNT of call records for each of my "Patient Assessment"…
-
Ah good! I'm not sure, but isn't a phone call a "type" of activity? In other words, if I created an FK on Task and Phone Call for my parent it would result in a single join. If I wanted to work with them separately couldn't I just filter by Activity.Type? I will mess around with this tonight. When is .2 scheduled? I was…
-
[snip...] I want to stay away from Grouping because we use direct list editing on the results... and grouping causes us to click away from the list too frequently. This is a highly interactive results list and direct list editing is essential. I currently receive a list that has multiple lines for the same Case because it…
-
Enhancement 144009 - Search Result: Ability to have support added to the formula syntax to print the internal ID of the select value.
-
Do you think that for non-joined fields it would be at all useful to pull the ID versus the lookup? I will an enhancment. For workflows like I've been creating lately it would be really helpful.
-
Do we know if there is an ER# for this? I could use this often...
-
Good to know, thanks Rob.
-
Oracle has limitations?! :p I will enter the order grouping as a defect.
-
In 2009.1 there is a "show totals" option on the results tab. I read your post and thought "oh cool" so I went and looked for it and sure enough, there it is! Set the field... save... click on Results link... OK...wait for it.... An unexpected error has occurred. Please click here to notify support and provide your contact…
-
Hi John, After deleting the search and starting over from scratch I can't reproduce it either. I was probably doing something wrong. Thanks for the help, Steve
-
I would get your Valium ready and put your ODBC hat on if I were you. I'm still not on Beta either, but from what I've been told (offline) serial number records aren't supported. How this is possible, how they have STILL left this off the supported record list is a mystery to me. I do have one workaround (in theory) but…
-
This may be a stupid suggestion. But if it's a one time export that you need, can you just login to beta and try the new search functionality in 2008.1? We added serial number searches in this release as you pointed out. Cheers! Tim Gale Sales Engineer It's not a stupid suggestion, but I don't have access to the Beta yet.…
-
One thing you could try doing is performing an item (or any item subtype) search and joining in inventorynumber fields. The search join to use would be inventoryNumber. This would give you access to all the inventory number fields for inventory number records associated with an inventory item. Hi Yang, I've tried this and…
-
I know how you feel man, I know how you feel...
-
I've gotten closer, but the item name still isn't coming over for some reason. Criteria[LIST] [*]MainLine = T [*]Customer : Internal ID = 907 [*]Type = Sales Order[/LIST]Results[LIST] [*]Customer : Name [*]Customer : Phone [*]Item : Name [*]Ship Via [*]Ship Date [*]Tracking Numbers[/LIST]When I run this from the UI it…
-
Yes, I get the same results in the UI.
-
I think what you want is custom sublists. Set the available filter to the field ont he record which is the customer. Let me know if this helps or if I can provide more information. Evan that looks very promising, I think that will be exactly what I want. Thanks for the tip. Update: This is EXACTLY what I wanted, thanks so…
-
Yes, the OR operator would be very useful and would cut back on the many, many saved searches I have created! ;) I voted for Enhancement 130832
-
Two things: [LIST] [*]"for 99% of NS users the search builder UI is great" - this isn't a good way to get things my way, is it? :p [*]Yang, not just the existing enterprise views but the ability to create our own Views in our respective schemas/catalogs[/LIST]I'll log the enhancement and post here.
-
response.writeLine('testing saved search...'); var filters = new Array(new nlobjSearchFilter('name', null, 'is', '907')); var results = nlapiSearchRecord(REC_IDS.SO, 'customsearch52', filters); if(results == null || results.length < 1) { response.writeLine('null search result returned'); return; }…
-
To be honest Evan, I'm a bit lost now. Is the Main Line just the first line? What is the Main Line? If I remove Main Line I have three results:[LIST] [*]-None- [*]Duet (one of our products) [*]Field Dispensed (a shipping item)[/LIST]When I drill down on each result this is what I see:[LIST] [*]-None- > "No results match…
-
Done. Here are the results testing saved search... Columns: 7 shipdate: Value: 1/27/2008 itemid: Value: null shipmethod: Value: 525 entityid: Value: George, Johnson - ****5589 trackingnumbers: Value: null phone: Value: (124) 444-7854 name: Value: null number of results: 1 Thanks for sticking with this :o
-
Actually.... what I'd REALLY like is to be able to create custom Views (DB Views), define the SQL myself so I know exactly what I'm getting. I appreciate how complex a query building UI is to make and I'm sure that for 99% of NS users the search builder UI is great, but for me it would be much more comfortable to edit the…
-
Steve, Excellent idea! Expose enterprise views in SuiteScript. Please enter an enhancement for this so that it's priority gets bumped up. Thanks, Yang Enhancement 139316 - Expose Enterprise Views to Suitescript and to the Saved Search UI Editor Enhancement 139318 - ODBC > Ability to define custom Enterprise Views
-
[LIST=1] [*]OK, I suspected that. I will fish around the help and the UG for some expression samples. If anyone out there has a dead simple example of an expression for a criteria I would appreciate it. [*]This is a bummer. Of course my next question is "when will this be supported?" (hoping you say it's coming in 2008.1)…