Enhancement #131536 says "Status = Open - Targeted at a Release". What does that mean? Is it part of v2009.1? -Tom

Yes. We use multiple vendors and we would like to update our webstore prices by doing a mass update that uses... Criteria: Item is drop shipped = yes Item is set to display online = yes Mass update applied to field = "online price" Set to Value = "preferred vendor price" * 1.5 -Tom

I guess I could do an item export and import, but I am afraid of those. The data doesn't map right on the import. In other words, the exported file has to be doctored and columns rearranged and renamed to fit the requirements for an import file (unless they have changed it). There was a previous enhancement to make an item…

Does this also mean that using "Lists > Mass Update > Update Prices" we can not set it to... "online price" = "preferred vendor price" * 1.5 ...is that also not possible at this time? I could see how to do it with variables of "entered price" ...but no way if you use multiple vendors and want to use your preferred vendor's…

I'm not terribly afraid of that export/import method anymore, but I do still want a feature where I could do a mass update with a formula... like... "online price" = "preferred vendor price" * 1.5 It would be faster than the export/import method and could be done by a less experienced NS user plus I could save it so I can…

Never mind. Looks like they made a duplication error. It was entered as BOTH an enhancement AND an Issue. Issue 132657 Type = Defect Severity = S2 - Urgent and also... Enhancement 132825

AGAIN NS puts in a BUG FIX as an enhancement. I get a NS ERROR MESSAGE on the screen when trying to work with a list of items that is set to display the column for meta-tags ...an yet it is considered an enhancement and not an issue. So, I guess people have to vote for a "enhancement" or the NS error message won't go away.…

Both 'Sales Units' and 'Minimum Quantity' fields are set on this item. There seems to be a bug when both are set. Until it is fixed, try blanking out the latter, update your matrix, and I think your quantity/price grid will be fixed. Worked like a charm. Thanks, Barry

Yes. The parent and the children are all entered the same and none of them have a "25+" unit pricing. The highest quantity pricing discount (for all items) is at 20. T

I put in a case via email. I tried to call about it, but hung up after an hour. I don't have the time or incentive to hold for hours unless I am getting help with an issue that is caused by my lack of knowledge. When it is obviously NS's bug...I'm not going to waste a good portion of my day building the NS product…

Bill, Thanks for voting for this "enhancement". Do you think this should be an issue and not an enhancement? It is a broken feature and it is producing the wrong results for NS users, so in my book ...it's an issue. T

Looks like they closed issue 130815 because it had a similar enhancement that already existed. So, this is in as an enhancement and not an issue. I find it odd when they enter a fix of an obviously broken feature as an enhancement and not an issue. This one is now Enhancement 124461. I guess that means that people have to…

NS, says a possible work around is to adjust price on the PO and adjust quantity to what it should be. In the sample in the first post, we would adjust the quantity to 6 and the price to $1 each. I haven't tested, but their suggestion could be an inventory nightmare. With the current BUG, we don't know what the "one unit"…

We are strongly considering allowing a preference here in an upcoming release. We know for a fact that some drop shippers want to use Sales units when drop shipping, which is why we did it the way we did and why it would have to be a preference. Evan, We want drop-ship POs to use PURCHASE UNITS. Isn't that what a purchase…

Presumably the drop shipper wants to see the units the customer ordered in because that's what they need to fulfill. Why would that be assumed even after we picked a different type of UNIT for our "ordering units"? That assumption isn't true for us. We sell a 12-pack and our drop-ship vendor that fulfills the orders wants…

NS, any ETA on this fix? This is causing frequent mistakes from our vendors!!

NS Issue 130815

Enhancement 109819 Be able to specify what locations get auto-calculated inventory or exclude a location from auto-calculations for any particular item.

Case# 611823 Enhancement# 109819

Has anyone figured out a work-around for this NS bug? We really need to use auto-calculations for our inventory reorders but we can't because of this bug. We moved a BUNCH of items from warehouse "A" to Warehouse "B". Now NetSuite tells us to order items to fill up the inventory at BOTH warehouses. We don't want these…

MCO, Any ETA on a fix? Is this really an enhancement and not a bug? Our auto-inventory controls are broken without a way to stop NS from trying to re-fill locations that we aren't using for a particular range of products. -Tom

NS. any way this could be considered a bug ...since it prevents us from using a major feature that we are paying for? Inventory management is unusable for us until this issue is addressed. -Tom

Ofer, thanks for the help ...but NS has already identified the glitch and there is no work-around at this time. I believe that I got an email that said that the status of the fix is "fix undergoing testing". Our website is at http://www.signsdirect.com

disregard - problem fixed

disregard - problem fixed

The logo in our WEB STORE doesn't take our CUSTOMERS to our home page anymore. The feature to set the logo link is ALSO missing from the NS preferences. -Tom

The dashboard reminder problem was our error. On a different note ...we use multiple locations and one location has one unpaid employee/user that is set to be a "LOCATION specific user" and they are really not an employee, but rather a fulfillment company that ship some of our inventory. Prior to v2007, they could ONLY see…

aliu: Any ETA on the fix? T

aliu: Is the fix part of v2007 or is it coming sooner?

aliu: I have recently been upgraded to v2007 and we still have the same problem. T