My Stuff
Nominate Your Peers for NetSuite Support Community's Choice of the Quarter! Submit your nomination today.
Intelligent Payment Automation version 1.0.3 is now available in the SuiteApp Marketplace. The SuiteApp, powered by BILL, lets you automate payments, manage vendor details, and bank account information within NetSuite. Learn more
Comments
-
I'm not sure why it is being considered for a new release when this was functionality that was available previous to version 11. When is the next targeted release date?
-
Here is a possible work around. What if you updated the parent and the child items using a csv import. For me, this is quicker anyways because you can easily manipulate the data in excel. I do agree that the matrix items need some help. I would like to see the following: 1. Option price automatically displayed in the drop…
-
This would also be a great feature for us. This thread has been going on for a while without a NS response. Does someone from NS know if this is currently possible, and if not, is it a feature that may be added in the future. Thanks
-
I was under the understanding that with version 11, the URL could be changed to http://domain.com/cars/ford/explorer.html rather than then current URL format http://domain.com/sc_15/category_211/id_2311.f Is there anyone on Version 11 that can confirm this. Thanks
-
Thank you!
-
Bill, That would be great if you could share the code with me. We were also planning on import bills for drop ship po's - but from what it sounds like, it's not possible - thats dissapointing. Do you know what the issue is? Thanks alot!
-
Any updates as of today? Anyone get this to work?
-
Thanks for the help - I will dig in and see if I can use it. I Appreciate it
-
Doesn't the item fulfillment grab the weight info off of the item record? If so, you could use the 'item fields..' search join to get it? Hope that helps
-
Just on a regular Search Results page that I am going to use a default view for Opportunities.
-
Bummer - I don't like using the summary searches because it makes the results look yucky and highlighting doesn't work. Thanks for your help though.
-
You know what - I may be misunderstanding how the Summary search works. Do I use it on the criteria tab or on the results tab?
-
oh cool - i will have to check into that. Anyway to keep the results from being links with underlines?
-
You have come through like always - I am giving it a try right now thanks!
-
It works perfectly. I also added it to a sublist on the item record. Thank you
-
bummer - but thanks Evan! appreciate it the quick replay
-
I really appreciate your help. It seems that the join is working properly. On the purchase order i have the sublist and it shows the bill that is associated with the purchase order. i can add additional bills to this (which was another requirement that i didn't mention - so its great). But when i run a saved search and i…
-
Thanks Chris, What I am trying to do is associate a bill to a purchase order - but the bill is not 'created from' the purchase order. It is a freight bill from a shipping company. I need to do this for reporting purposes. So my PO does have a bill 'created from' the PO that I received from the vendor. This will give me the…
-
Thank Evan, i like the first idea cause it should be free - as opposed to paying someone to write script. i did what you said (created a custom field called 'associated transaction' and I see the associated bill in a sublist on the purchase order. -Great! I then tried to get to those fields via a saved search and I…
-
Sorry - the associated transaction fields are empty
-
awesome - worked perfectly! Thanks again.
-
Evan, Thanks for the response. I have tried successfully to get these results in 2008.1 with the proper criteria, for my item search I need to do this using a formula. Do you think that it's possible?
-
A saved search is what I wanted - i shouldn't have said report - sorry. Can you give me an example of a formula that could subtract these two fields? thanks
-
Works perfectly! Thank you!
-
worked perfectly - thanks for all your help!
-
Evan, This works great except in cases where we have multiple vendors. Can the field {item.vendorcost} be replaced with something equivalent to {item.preferredvendorcost} so we only pick up the preferred vendor. Thanks!
-
Evan, Thanks for responding. I think you are right. I think it would have to be based on custom periods. The "previous two weeks" may be too generic.
-
Thanks for your help! You answer a lot of my requests - I don't think the owner of SalesForce does that for his customers.
-
I voted for this enhancement. Would be very beneficial to us. Enhancement # 157655
-
Thanks - I needed a good laugh. I'm voting for it!